Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30455755›Full record

ArticleOpen access Macedonian journal of medical sciences2018

Determinants of Exclusive Breastfeeding in a Sample of Egyptian Infants.

Wafaa A Kandeel, Thanaa M Rabah, Dina Abu Zeid, Ebtissam M Salah El-Din, Ammal M Metwally, Ashraf Shaalan, Lobna A El Etreby, Sanaa Y Shaaban

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05281146 (Production of Fortified Biscuit With Chickpea and Crushed Peanut and Evaluating Its Effectiveness in Terms of Its Acceptability and Cognitive Performance), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05281146 nacompletednot on this map

Production of Fortified Biscuit With Chickpea and Crushed Peanut and Evaluating Its Effectiveness in Terms of Its Acceptability and Cognitive Performance: a Pilot Study Among Egyptian Primary School-aged Children

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Research Centre, EgyptRan2018 to 2021Enrolled80ConditionsCognitive PerformanceArmsChickpeas and crushed peanuts fortified biscuit, Cognitive stimulation for the mothers, Cognitive stimulation for students
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Wafaa A KandeelBiological Anthropology Department, Medical Research Division, National Research Centre, Giza, Egypt.
Thanaa M RabahDepartment of Community Medicine Research, Medical Research Division, National Research Centre, Giza, Egypt.
Dina Abu ZeidChild Health Department, Medical Research Division, National Research Centre, Giza, Egypt.
Ebtissam M Salah El-DinChild Health Department, Medical Research Division, National Research Centre, Giza, Egypt.
Ammal M MetwallyDepartment of Community Medicine Research, Medical Research Division, National Research Centre, Giza, Egypt.
Ashraf ShaalanBiological Anthropology Department, Medical Research Division, National Research Centre, Giza, Egypt.
Lobna A El EtrebyDepartment of Community Medicine Research, Medical Research Division, National Research Centre, Giza, Egypt.
Sanaa Y ShaabanDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreastfeeding is an optimum, healthy, and economical mode of feeding an infant. However, many preventable obstacles hinder exclusive breastfeeding in the first six months of life.

aimWe aimed to assess the social-, maternal- and infant-related factors disturbing exclusive breastfeeding in the first six months of life.

methodsIt is a retrospective study included 827 dyads of mothers and infants older than 6 months (411 exclusively breastfed, 311 artificially-fed and 105 mixed feds). Mothers were interviewed to obtain sociodemographic information, maternal medical history and perinatal history and a detailed history of infant feeding. RSULTS: Many factors were found to support the decision for artificial feeding rather than exclusive breastfeeding, including maternal age < 25 years (OR = 2.252), child birth order > 3rd (OR = 2.436), being a primi-para (OR = 1.878), single marital status (OR = 2.762), preterm infant (OR = 3.287) and complicated labor (OR = 1.841). Factors in favor of mixed feeding included cesarean section (OR = 2.004) and admission to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (OR = 1.925).

conclusionsAlthough it isn't a community-based study and its results can't be generalised, plans to improve health and development of children are preferable to include the following: health education and awareness programs about the importance of exclusive breastfeeding should be directed for young and first-time mothers. Improved antenatal care to reduce perinatal and neonatal problems; and training, monitoring, and supervising community health care workers to recognise labour complications and provide support and knowledge to lactating mothers.

Indexed as

Egyptian infantsExclusive breastfeedingInfant feedingMixed FeedingSocial factors

Identifiers

PMID30455755
PMCPMC6236050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.