ArticleInternational journal of mental health systems2018
Increasing access to psychological treatments for adults by improving uptake and equity: rationale and lessons from the UK.
Article in International journal of mental health systems, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06905223 (A Pilot Study on the Efficacy of a Synbiotic Formula), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Pilot Study on the Efficacy of a Synbiotic Formula (MQU10) in Improving Mood and Well-being in Adults With Mild to Moderate Depressive Symptoms
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Training to Practice: The Influence of Education and Training on Attitudes Towards Psychotherapy Among Psychiatry Residents and Early-Career Psychiatrists.Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2026Article
- Impact of Online Group Psychoeducation and Support Sessions on Receptivity Towards Digital Mental Health Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Pilot Study.Journal of technology in behavioral science · 2022Article
- How Can We Actually Change Help-Seeking Behaviour for Mental Health Problems among the General Public? Development of the 'PLACES' Model.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesAccess to psychological treatments has been defined by Gulliford as comprising supply, effectiveness, equity and uptake. In the UK, a recent national programme "Improving Access to Psychological Treatments" has significantly increased supply and assessed effectiveness, but paid less attention to uptake and equity. The model developed by Gask et al. delineating processes relevant to improving access for 'hard-to-engage' groups in the UK, including black and minority groups seems relevant. This paper presents studies of a large-scale 'community workshop' intervention model developed by Brown to improve access for adults in the UK, designed to improve uptake and equity. We describe two 'community workshop' interventions for common mental health problems to which people have been able to self-refer and where uptake and equity have been high. Key components of this model are a 'group-sensitive engagement' ethos which includes self-referral, non-diagnostic titles of the intervention, a non-mental health setting, face-to-face presentation as well as a brief intervention and an acceptable format.
conclusionThe model of community workshops with its 'group-sensitive engagement' ethos to which adults can self-refer may be very relevant in providing access for people with mental health needs in national and international settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.