Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30455729›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of mental health systems2018

Increasing access to psychological treatments for adults by improving uptake and equity: rationale and lessons from the UK.

June S L Brown

Registry-linked trialAbstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of mental health systems, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06905223 (A Pilot Study on the Efficacy of a Synbiotic Formula), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06905223 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

A Pilot Study on the Efficacy of a Synbiotic Formula (MQU10) in Improving Mood and Well-being in Adults With Mild to Moderate Depressive Symptoms

TypeinterventionalSponsorGenieBiome LimitedRan2025 to 2027Enrolled30ConditionsDepressive Symptoms Mild to Moderate in SeverityArmsMQU10
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. From Training to Practice: The Influence of Education and Training on Attitudes Towards Psychotherapy Among Psychiatry Residents and Early-Career Psychiatrists.Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

June S L BrownPsychology Department, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF UK.

Funding

Department of Health PB-PG-1207-15154
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAccess to psychological treatments has been defined by Gulliford as comprising supply, effectiveness, equity and uptake. In the UK, a recent national programme "Improving Access to Psychological Treatments" has significantly increased supply and assessed effectiveness, but paid less attention to uptake and equity. The model developed by Gask et al. delineating processes relevant to improving access for 'hard-to-engage' groups in the UK, including black and minority groups seems relevant. This paper presents studies of a large-scale 'community workshop' intervention model developed by Brown to improve access for adults in the UK, designed to improve uptake and equity. We describe two 'community workshop' interventions for common mental health problems to which people have been able to self-refer and where uptake and equity have been high. Key components of this model are a 'group-sensitive engagement' ethos which includes self-referral, non-diagnostic titles of the intervention, a non-mental health setting, face-to-face presentation as well as a brief intervention and an acceptable format.

conclusionThe model of community workshops with its 'group-sensitive engagement' ethos to which adults can self-refer may be very relevant in providing access for people with mental health needs in national and international settings.

Indexed as

AccessEquity“Group-sensitive engagement”Self-referralUnmet needUptake

Identifiers

PMID30455729
PMCPMC6225624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.