Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30455724›Full record

ArticlePlant methods2018

Investigating the microstructure of plant leaves in 3D with lab-based X-ray computed tomography.

Andrew W Mathers, Christopher Hepworth, Alice L Baillie, Jen Sloan, Hannah Jones, Marjorie Lundgren, Andrew J Fleming, Sacha J Mooney, Craig J Sturrock

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. CT image-based 3D inflorescence estimation ofFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew W Mathers *1Division of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, Leicestershire LE12 5RD UK.
Christopher Hepworth *2Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield, S10 2TN UK.
Alice L Baillie *2Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield, S10 2TN UK.
Jen Sloan *2Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield, S10 2TN UK.
Hannah Jones2Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield, S10 2TN UK.
Marjorie Lundgren3Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, LEC 2 Yellow Zone B43, Lancaster, LA1 4YQ UK.
Andrew J Fleming2Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield, S10 2TN UK.
Sacha J Mooney1Division of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, Leicestershire LE12 5RD UK.
Craig J Sturrock1Division of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, Leicestershire LE12 5RD UK.
University of Sheffield · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GBLancaster University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLeaf cellular architecture plays an important role in setting limits for carbon assimilation and, thus, photosynthetic performance. However, the low density, fine structure, and sensitivity to desiccation of plant tissue has presented challenges to its quantification. Classical methods of tissue fixation and embedding prior to 2D microscopy of sections is both laborious and susceptible to artefacts that can skew the values obtained. Here we report an image analysis pipeline that provides quantitative descriptors of plant leaf intercellular airspace using lab-based X-ray computed tomography (microCT). We demonstrate successful visualisation and quantification of differences in leaf intercellular airspace in 3D for a range of species (including both dicots and monocots) and provide a comparison with a standard 2D analysis of leaf sections.

resultsWe used the microCT image pipeline to obtain estimates of leaf porosity and mesophyll exposed surface area (S

conclusionsOur results demonstrate the utility of high resolution imaging of leaf intercellular airspace networks by lab-based microCT and provide quantitative data on descriptors of leaf cellular architecture. They indicate there is a range of porosity and S

Indexed as

Air channelsGas exchangeLeaf structurePhotosynthesisPorosityX-ray computed tomography (microCT)

Identifiers

PMID30455724
PMCPMC6231253
OpenAlexW2901499387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.