Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30455518›Full record

ArticleBulletin of the World Health Organization2018

Public health system integration of avoidable blindness screening and management, India.

Venkata Sm Gudlavalleti, Rajan Shukla, Tripura Batchu, Bala Vidyadhar S Malladi, Clare Gilbert

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Benefits of integrating eye care into health systems.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Venkata Sm GudlavalletiIndian Institute of Public Health, Public Health Foundation of India, Kavuri Hills, Madhapur,
Hyderabad 500 033,Telangana, India.
Rajan ShuklaIndian Institute of Public Health, Public Health Foundation of India, Kavuri Hills, Madhapur,
Hyderabad 500 033,Telangana, India.
Tripura BatchuIndian Institute of Public Health, Public Health Foundation of India, Kavuri Hills, Madhapur,
Hyderabad 500 033,Telangana, India.
Bala Vidyadhar S MalladiIndian Institute of Public Health, Public Health Foundation of India, Kavuri Hills, Madhapur,
Hyderabad 500 033,Telangana, India.
Clare GilbertClinical Research Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, England.
Institute of Public Health Bengaluru · INLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In India, 73 million people have diabetes and 3.5 million infants are born preterm. Without timely screening, there is a risk of visual loss due to diabetic retinopathy and retinopathy of prematurity in these two groups, respectively. Both conditions are emerging causes of visual impairment in India but there is no public health programme for screening or management. Pilot projects were initiated in 2014 to integrate the screening and management of these conditions into existing public health systems, particularly in rural communities and their referral networks. The World Health Organization's health systems framework was used to develop the projects and strategies were developed with all stakeholders, including the government. Both projects involved hub-and-spoke models of care units around medical schools. For diabetic retinopathy, screening was established at primary health-care facilities and treatment was provided at district hospitals. For retinopathy of prematurity, screening was integrated into sick newborn care units at the district level and treatment facilities were improved at the closest publically funded medical schools. In the first two years, there were substantial improvements in awareness, screening, treatment and partnership between stakeholders, and changes in public health policy. By March 2018, diabetic retinopathy screening was established at 50 facilities in 10 states and treatment had been improved at 10 hospitals, whereas retinopathy of prematurity screening was established at 16 sick newborn care units in district hospital in four states and treatment had been improved at six medical schools. Advocacy within state governments was critical to the success of the initiative.

Indexed as

Public Health PracticeBlindnessDiabetic RetinopathyHealth EducationHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PolicyHumansIndiaInfant, NewbornNational Health ProgramsNeonatal ScreeningPrimary Health CareReferral and ConsultationRetinopathy of PrematurityWorld Health Organization

Identifiers

PMID30455518
PMCPMC6238995
OpenAlexW2893301140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.