Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30455517›Full record

ArticleBulletin of the World Health Organization2018

Evidence for national universal eye health plans.

Jacqueline Ramke, Anthony B Zwi, Juan Carlos Silva, Nyawira Mwangi, Hillary Rono, Michael Gichangi, Muhammad Babar Qureshi, Clare E Gilbert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. COVID-19 and the Unfinished Agenda of VISION 2020.American journal of ophthalmology · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. The inverse-research law of eye health.Eye (London, England) · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jacqueline RamkeFaculty of Infectious & Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, England.
Anthony B ZwiHealth, Rights and Development, School of Social Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Juan Carlos SilvaWorld Health Organization, Bogotá, Colombia.
Nyawira MwangiDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Kenya Medical Training College, Nairobi, Kenya.
Hillary RonoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kitale County and Referral Hospital, Kitale, Kenya.
Michael GichangiOphthalmic Services Unit, Ministry of Health, Nairobi, Kenya.
Muhammad Babar QureshiChristian Blind Mission, Cambridge, England.
Clare E GilbertFaculty of Infectious & Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, England.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many low- and middle-income countries use national eye-care plans to guide efforts to strengthen eye-care services. The World Health Organization recognizes that evidence is essential to inform these plans. We assessed how evidence was incorporated in a sample of 28 national eye-care plans generated since the

Indexed as

Developing CountriesAge FactorsBlindnessCataractCataract ExtractionGlobal HealthHealth PlanningHealth PrioritiesHumansInformation SystemsMobile ApplicationsNational Health ProgramsSex FactorsWorld Health Organization

Identifiers

PMID30455517
PMCPMC6238994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.