ReviewThe Journal of biological chemistry2019
Computational approaches for the analysis of RNA-protein interactions: A primer for biologists.
Review in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrating host-microbiome multi-omics with machine learning: methods, benchmarks, and translational applications.Science China. Life sciences · 2026Review
- Disruption of hnRNP A2-mediated RNA dynamics by amyloid-β drives MBP increase in Alzheimer's disease.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2025Article
- The regulatory landscape of interacting RNA and protein pools in cellular homeostasis and cancer.Human genomics · 2024Review
- A comprehensive thermodynamic model for RNA binding by the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pumilio protein PUF4.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Protein-RNA interaction prediction with deep learning: structure matters.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Towards an IdealInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Zooming in on protein-RNA interactions: a multi-level workflow to identify interaction partners.Biochemical Society transactions · 2020Review
- Microbiome Multi-Omics Network Analysis: Statistical Considerations, Limitations, and Opportunities.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) play important roles in the control of gene expression and the coordination of different layers of post-transcriptional regulation. Interactions between certain RBPs and mRNA transcripts are notoriously difficult to predict, as any given protein-RNA interaction may rely not only on RNA sequence, but also on three-dimensional RNA structures, competitive inhibition from other RBPs, and input from cellular signaling pathways. Advanced and high-throughput technologies for the identification of RNA-protein interactions have come to the rescue, but the identification of binding sites and downstream functional effects of RBPs from the resulting data can be challenging. In this review, we discuss statistical inference and machine-learning approaches and tools relevant for the study of RBPs and the analysis of large-scale RNA-protein interaction datasets. This primer is intended for life scientists who are interested in incorporating these tools into their own research. We begin with the demystification of regression models, as used in the analysis of next-generation sequencing data, and progress to a discussion of Hidden Markov Models, which are of particular value in analyzing cross-linking followed by immunoprecipitation data. We then continue with examples of machine learning techniques, such as support vector machines and gradient tree boosting. We close with a brief discussion of current trends in the field, including deep learning architectures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.