Observational studyDiabetes care2019
Development and Validation of a Simple Hip Fracture Risk Prediction Tool for Type 2 Diabetes: The Fremantle Diabetes Study Phase I.
Observational study in Diabetes care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Factors associated with fragility fractures in type 2 diabetes: An analysis of the randomised controlled Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) study.Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews · 2023Trial
- Managing Bone Fragility in Older Adults with Diabetes: Pathophysiology, Assessment, and Therapeutic Considerations.Drugs & aging · 2026Review
- FGF21 is a novel biomarker to predict fragility fractures in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Assessment of fracture risk in diabetic patients.Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2024Review
- Bone metabolism in diabetes: a clinician's guide to understanding the bone-glucose interplay.Diabetologia · 2024Review
- AI algorithms for accurate prediction of osteoporotic fractures in patients with diabetes: an up-to-date review.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Review
- Major osteoporosis fracture prediction in type 2 diabetes: a derivation and comparison study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2022Article
- Article
- Diabetes and bone.Osteoporosis and sarcopenia · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo develop a type 2 diabetes hip fracture risk tool in community-based patients, to validate it in an independent cohort, and to compare its performance against the only published prediction equation to include type 2 diabetes as a risk factor (QFracture). RESEARCH DESIGN AND
methodsHip fracture hospitalizations in 1,251 participants with type 2 diabetes aged 40-89 years from the longitudinal Fremantle Diabetes Study Phase I (FDS1) were ascertained between entry (1993-1996) and end-2012. Competing risk regression modeling determined independent predictors of time to first fracture over 10 years and the coefficients incorporated in a risk model. The model was validated in 286 participants with type 2 diabetes from the Busselton Health Study (BHS).
resultsFifty FDS1 participants (4.0%) experienced a first hip fracture during 10,306 person-years of follow-up. Independent predictors of fracture were older age, female sex, lower BMI, peripheral sensory neuropathy, and estimated glomerular filtration rate <45 mL/min/1.73 m
conclusionsThe FDS1 hip fracture risk equation is a simple validated adjunct to type 2 diabetes management that uses variables that are readily available in routine care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30455327What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.