ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018
Tracking job and housing dynamics with smartcard data.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Universal Neighborhood Effect Averaging in Mobility-Dependent Environmental Exposures.Environmental science & technology · 2024Article
- Urban visual intelligence: Uncovering hidden city profiles with street view images.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- A supervised machine learning model for imputing missing boarding stops in smart card data.Public transport (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Article
- The Effect of Commuting Time on Quality of Life: Evidence from China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- How Does City Size Affect the Cost of Household Travel? Evidence from an Urban Household Survey in China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Equity in Health-Seeking Behavior of Groups Using Different Transportations.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Quantitative Evaluation of TOD Performance Based on Multi-Source Data: A Case Study of Shanghai.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- How did human dwelling and working intensity change over different stages of COVID-19 in Beijing?Sustainable cities and society · 2021Article
- Scaling of contact networks for epidemic spreading in urban transit systems.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Article
- Urban commuting dynamics in response to public transit upgrades: A big data approach.PloS one · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Residential locations, the jobs-housing relationship, and commuting patterns are key elements to understand urban spatial structure and how city dwellers live. Their successive interaction is important for various fields including urban planning, transport, intraurban migration studies, and social science. However, understanding of the long-term trajectories of workplace and home location, and the resulting commuting patterns, is still limited due to lack of year-to-year data tracking individual behavior. With a 7-y transit smartcard dataset, this paper traces individual trajectories of residences and workplaces. Based on in-metro travel times before and after job and/or home moves, we find that 45 min is an inflection point where the behavioral preference changes. Commuters whose travel time exceeds the point prefer to shorten commutes via moves, while others with shorter commutes tend to increase travel time for better jobs and/or residences. Moreover, we capture four mobility groups: home mover, job hopper, job-and-residence switcher, and stayer. This paper studies how these groups trade off travel time and housing expenditure with their job and housing patterns. Stayers with high job and housing stability tend to be home (apartment unit) owners subject to middle- to high-income groups. Home movers work at places similar to stayers, while they may upgrade from tenancy to ownership. Switchers increase commute time as well as housing expenditure via job and home moves, as they pay for better residences and work farther from home. Job hoppers mainly reside in the suburbs, suffer from long commutes, change jobs frequently, and are likely to be low-income migrants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.