Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30455221›Full record

SynthesisThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2018

Characterising patient complaints in out-of-hours general practice: a retrospective cohort study in Ireland.

Emma Wallace, Sinead Cronin, Norah Murphy, Sudeh Cheraghi-Sohi, Kate MacSweeney, Mel Bates, Tom Fahey

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. An analysis of complaints about hospital care in the Republic of Ireland.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emma WallaceHealth Research Board Centre for Primary Care Research, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Sinead CroninHealth Research Board Centre for Primary Care Research, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Norah MurphyHealth Research Board Centre for Primary Care Research, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Sudeh Cheraghi-SohiNational Institute for Health Research, Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Kate MacSweeneyNorthdoc Medical Services Ltd, Dublin, Ireland.
Mel BatesNorthdoc Medical Services Ltd, Dublin, Ireland.
Tom FaheyHealth Research Board Centre for Primary Care Research, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient complaints can provide valuable insights into the quality and safety of clinical care. Studies examining the epidemiology of complaints in out-of-hours general practice internationally are limited.

aimTo characterise patient complaints in an out-of-hours general practice setting. DESIGN AND

settingRetrospective cohort study of patient complaints to an out-of-hours service provider in Dublin, Ireland, over a 5-year period (2011-2016). This comprises nurse-led telephone triage and GP consultations for patients with urgent problems.

methodA modified version of the UK Healthcare Complaints Analysis Tool (HCAT) was utilised to code complaints, which were reviewed independently in duplicate by two academic GPs.

resultsOf 445 598 telephone contacts, 303 085 resulted in face-to-face GP consultations. Of 234 patients who made 298 complaints, 185 (79%) related to GP care. The remainder related to nurse triage, other staff, and management issues. A total of 109 (46%) related to children aged ≤18 years, and 134 (58%) of complainants were female. There were 0.61 complaints per 1000 GP consultations. Most complaints (

conclusionThe majority of complaints related to clinical care problems and were successfully managed locally. Expectation management may be an important way to mitigate the risk of complaints.

Indexed as

After-Hours CareGeneral PracticeAdultChildCommunicationGeneral PractitionersHumansIrelandNursesPatient SatisfactionProcess Assessment, Health CareReferral and ConsultationRetrospective StudiesTriagecohort studiesgeneral practiceout-of-hours medical carepatient complaintsretrospective studies

Identifiers

PMID30455221
PMCPMC6255233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.