Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30455214›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2018

Facets of phylodiversity: evolutionary diversification, divergence and survival as conservation targets.

Matthew M Kling, Brent D Mishler, Andrew H Thornhill, Bruce G Baldwin, David D Ackerly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Biological collections for understanding biodiversity in the Anthropocene.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Matthew M KlingDepartment of Integrative Biology, University and Jepson Herbaria/University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3200, USA mattkling@berkeley.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9073-4240
Brent D MishlerDepartment of Integrative Biology, University and Jepson Herbaria/University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3200, USA.
Andrew H ThornhillDepartment of Integrative Biology, University and Jepson Herbaria/University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3200, USA.
Bruce G BaldwinDepartment of Integrative Biology, University and Jepson Herbaria/University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3200, USA.
David D AckerlyDepartment of Integrative Biology, University and Jepson Herbaria/University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3200, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biodiversity is often described as having multiple facets, including species richness, functional diversity and phylogenetic diversity. In this paper, we argue that phylogenetic diversity itself has three distinct facets-lineage diversification, character divergence and survival time-that can be quantified using distinct branch length metrics on an evolutionary tree. Each dimension is related to different processes of macroevolution, has different spatial patterns and is tied to distinct goals for conserving biodiversity and protecting its future resilience and evolutionary potential. We compared the landscapes identified as top conservation priorities by each of these three metrics in a conservation gap analysis for California, a world biodiversity hotspot, using herbarium data on the biogeography and evolutionary relationships of more than 5000 native plant species. Our analysis incorporated a novel continuous metric of current land protection status, fine-scale data on landscape intactness and an optimization algorithm used to identify complementary priority sites containing concentrations of taxa that are evolutionarily unique, vulnerable due to small range size and/or poorly protected across their ranges. Top conservation priorities included pockets of coastal and northern California that ranked highly for all three phylodiversity dimensions and for species richness, as well as sites uniquely identified by each metric whose value may depend on whether properties such as genetic divergence, high net diversification or independent survival experience are most desirable in an Anthropocene flora.This article is part of the theme issue 'Biological collections for understanding biodiversity in the Anthropocene'.

Indexed as

BiodiversityBiological EvolutionConservation of Natural ResourcesCaliforniaPhylogenyPlantsbiodiversity conservationbiogeographyCalifornia floramacroevolutionphylogenetic diversityreserve design

Identifiers

PMID30455214
PMCPMC6282076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.