Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30455205›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2018

Museum specimens of terrestrial vertebrates are sensitive indicators of environmental change in the Anthropocene.

C Jonathan Schmitt, Joseph A Cook, Kelly R Zamudio, Scott V Edwards

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Evolution of Bees: Insights from 'Omic Studies.Genome biology and evolution · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Measuring historical pollution: Natural history collections as tools for public health and environmental justice research.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  10. Global natural history infrastructure requires international solidarity, support, and investment in local capacity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

C Jonathan SchmittMuseum of Comparative Zoology and Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3100-7331
Joseph A CookMuseum of Southwestern Biology & Biology Department, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3985-0670
Kelly R ZamudioMuseum of Vertebrates and Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5107-6206
Scott V EdwardsMuseum of Comparative Zoology and Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA sedwards@fas.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2535-6217

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural history museums and the specimen collections they curate are vital scientific infrastructure, a fact as true today as it was when biologists began collecting and preserving specimens over 200 years ago. The importance of museum specimens in studies of taxonomy, systematics, ecology and evolutionary biology is evidenced by a rich and abundant literature, yet creative and novel uses of specimens are constantly broadening the impact of natural history collections on biodiversity science and global sustainability. Excellent examples of the critical importance of specimens come from their use in documenting the consequences of environmental change, which is particularly relevant considering the alarming rate at which we now modify our planet in the Anthropocene. In this review, we highlight the important role of bird, mammal and amphibian specimens in documenting the Anthropocene and provide examples that underscore the need for continued collection of museum specimens.This article is part of the theme issue 'Biological collections for understanding biodiversity in the Anthropocene'.

Indexed as

AmphibiansBirdsEnvironmentMammalsMuseumsAnimalsBiodiversityClimate ChangeCommunicable DiseasesEnvironmental PollutantsLife History TraitsSpecimen HandlingEnvironmental PollutantsAnthropoceneclimate changecontaminationemergent diseasemuseum specimens

Identifiers

PMID30455205
PMCPMC6282080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.