ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2019
A Low Resolution Epistasis Mapping Approach To Identify Chromosome Arm Interactions in Allohexaploid Wheat.
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analysis of historical selection in winter wheat.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2022Article
- The decreased expression of GW2 homologous genes contributed to the increased grain width and thousand‑grain weight in wheat-Dasypyrum villosum 6VS·6DL translocation lines.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2021Article
- Genetic basis of maize kernel oil-related traits revealed by high-density SNP markers in a recombinant inbred line population.BMC plant biology · 2021Article
- Article
- Exploring Deep Learning for Complex Trait Genomic Prediction in Polyploid Outcrossing Species.Frontiers in plant science · 2020Article
- Prediction of Subgenome Additive and Interaction Effects in Allohexaploid Wheat.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epistasis is an important contributor to genetic variance. In inbred populations, pairwise epistasis is present as additive by additive interactions. Testing for epistasis presents a multiple testing problem as the pairwise search space for modest numbers of markers is large. Single markers do not necessarily track functional units of interacting chromatin as well as haplotype based methods do. To harness the power of multiple markers while minimizing the number of tests conducted, we present a low resolution test for epistatic interactions across whole chromosome arms. Epistasis covariance matrices were constructed from the additive covariances of individual chromosome arms. These covariances were subsequently used to estimate an epistatic variance parameter while correcting for background additive and epistatic effects. We find significant epistasis for 2% of the interactions tested for four agronomic traits in a winter wheat breeding population. Interactions across homeologous chromosome arms were identified, but were less abundant than other chromosome arm pair interactions. The homeologous chromosome arm pair 4BL/4DL showed a strong negative relationship between additive and interaction effects that may be indicative of functional redundancy. Several chromosome arms appeared to act as hubs in an interaction network, suggesting that they may contain important regulatory factors. The differential patterns of epistasis across different traits demonstrate that detection of epistatic interactions is robust when correcting for background additive and epistatic effects in the population. The low resolution epistasis mapping method presented here identifies important epistatic interactions with a limited number of statistical tests at the cost of low precision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.