Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30455164›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2018

Health Data for Research Through a Nationwide Privacy-Proof System in Belgium: Design and Implementation.

Nicolas Delvaux, Bert Aertgeerts, Johan Ch van Bussel, Geert Goderis, Bert Vaes, Mieke Vermandere

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05920499 (The Effect of AUDIT and Feedback on Pneumococcal Vaccination Coverage in Adults At Risk in General Practice), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05920499 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of AUDIT and Feedback on Pneumococcal Vaccination Coverage in Adults At Risk in General Practice: a Cluster Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorBert VaesRan2025 to 2026Enrolled36ConditionsPneumococcal InfectionsArmsAUDIT and Feedback
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Development and early implementation of automated audit and feedback monitoring instruments in Belgian primary care: lessons for scalable systems.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2026
    Article
  6. Data resource profile: the Intego-II primary care database.International journal of epidemiology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nicolas DelvauxDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7335-4075
Bert AertgeertsDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1142-5402
Johan Ch van BusselSciensano, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8254-329X
Geert GoderisDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5303-2290
Bert VaesDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5244-1930
Mieke VermandereDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0437-6633

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth data collected during routine care have important potential for reuse for other purposes, especially as part of a learning health system to advance the quality of care. Many sources of bias have been identified through the lifecycle of health data that could compromise the scientific integrity of these data. New data protection legislation requires research facilities to improve safety measures and, thus, ensure privacy.

objectiveThis study aims to address the question on how health data can be transferred from various sources and using multiple systems to a centralized platform, called Healthdata.be, while ensuring the accuracy, validity, safety, and privacy. In addition, the study demonstrates how these processes can be used in various research designs relevant for learning health systems.

methodsThe Healthdata.be platform urges uniformity of the data registration at the primary source through the use of detailed clinical models. Data retrieval and transfer are organized through end-to-end encrypted electronic health channels, and data are encoded using token keys. In addition, patient identifiers are pseudonymized so that health data from the same patient collected across various sources can still be linked without compromising the deidentification.

resultsThe Healthdata.be platform currently collects data for >150 clinical registries in Belgium. We demonstrated how the data collection for the Belgian primary care morbidity register INTEGO is organized and how the Healthdata.be platform can be used for a cluster randomized trial.

conclusionsCollecting health data in various sources and linking these data to a single patient is a promising feature that can potentially address important concerns on the validity and quality of health data. Safe methods of data transfer without compromising privacy are capable of transporting these data from the primary data provider or clinician to a research facility. More research is required to demonstrate that these methods improve the quality of data collection, allowing researchers to rely on electronic health records as a valid source for scientific data.

Indexed as

electronic health recordshealth information exchangehealth information interoperabilitylearning health systemsmedical record linkage

Identifiers

PMID30455164
PMCPMC6300317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.