SynthesisEuropean neuropsychopharmacology : the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology2018
Spicing it up - synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists and psychosis - a systematic review.
Synthesis in European neuropsychopharmacology : the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Within-subject, double-blinded, randomized, and placebo-controlled evaluation of the combined effects of the cannabinoid dronabinol and the opioid hydromorphone in a human laboratory pain model.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2021Trial
- Demographic and clinical profiles of drug-induced psychosis: age, gender, and social context in a German cohort.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2026Article
- Evaluating signaling bias for synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists at the cannabinoid CBPharmacology research & perspectives · 2023Article
- The Use of Psychoactive Substances in Germany.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2022Article
- Substance Use in the Population-A Plea for a Balanced Discussion.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2022Article
- Cannabidiol (CBD) as a novel treatment in the early phases of psychosis.Psychopharmacology · 2022Review
- Incidence of inpatient cases with mental disorders due to use of cannabinoids in Germany: a nationwide evaluation.European journal of public health · 2022Article
- Anti-Neuronal Autoantibodies (Cell Surface and Onconeural) and Their Association With Natural Autoantibodies in Synthetic Cannabinoid-Induced Psychosis.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- Synthetic cannabinoid use in psychiatric patients and relationship to hospitalisation: A retrospective electronic case register study.Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
- Designer drugs: mechanism of action and adverse effects.Archives of toxicology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists (SCRAs) are suggested to have increased potential to induce psychosis compared to natural cannabis (NC). In this review we synthesise current knowledge about the association of SCRA use with psychotic symptoms. Following a literature search we identified 2 toxicology reports, 4 case-control studies, 3 cross-sectional studies and 15 case reports. In each of the case reports, we identified the presence or absence of symptoms based on the items of the Postitive and Negative Syndrome Scele (PANSS). The toxicology reports highlighted the main presenting features as being toxic psychosis and delirium (40%), agitation (10%) and hallucinations (4-7%). The median age was 25 years, and around 80% cases were male. Cross-sectional studies reported that SCRA use was present in approximately 10-13% patients presenting to acute psychiatric services, and was often the cause of their presentation, and that psychotic symptoms were present in 15% patients attending emergency departments following SCRA use. Case-control studies reported that SCRA use was significantly associated with psychotic symptoms and that SCRA users had higher levels of positive psychotic symptoms than NC users. The case reports supported the association of SCRA use with a wide range of positive and negative psychotic symptoms as well as with self-harm, agitation and aggressive behaviour. SCRA use is relatively prevalent in patients with psychosis and may lead to psychotic symptoms in individuals with no past psychiatric history. Further work is required to understand the long term risks of SCRA use and optimal management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.