ArticleZhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer2018
[Disparities of EGFR mutations between Biopsy and Rebiopsy in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients].
Article in Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEpidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-based targeted therapy improves the survival of patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma harboring EGFR mutations. However, factors including treatment or heterogeneity partly contribute to EGFR genetic status alteration between baseline and disease progresses (PD). The aim of this study is to compare difference of EGFR mutations between biopsy and rebiopsy in real world.
methodsData from 61 paired specimens performed EGFR testing in Jilin Provincial Cancer Hospital between January 2015 and December 2017 were collected and analyzed. The specimens were collected at baseline and PD, confirmed by histology or cytology and categorized as tumor tissue, malignant pleural effusion or plasma. All patients were naive and received chemotherapy or targeted therapy as first-line treatment. Amplification Refractory Mutation System (ARMS) was used to detect EGFR mutations.
resultsEGFR mutation rate in tumor tissue, pleural effusion or blood was 90.2% vs 88.5%, 6.6% vs 6.6% and 3.2% vs 4.9% at baseline or PD respectively and discrepancy was 72% and 36.3% for the same (n=50) or different (n=11) type of specimens. The EGFR mutation rate was 95.1% and 91.8% in patients before and after treatment, and the discrepancy was 63.9%, among which, 69.2% and 92.3% in chemotherapy-treated patients (n=13) with discrepancy to 46.1% (6/13), and 100.0% and 91.7% in EGFR-TKI-treated patients (n=48) with discrepancy to 70.8%. There were four types of alterations in terms of EGFR mutations: wild type turned into mutation (4.9%), mutation disappeared (8.2%), sensitive mutations transformed (1.6%), and new mutations appeared (49.1%).
conclusionsIn real world, the EGFR mutation status in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients altered significantly, due to tissue resources and therapeutic approaches, implying the importance of rebiopsy and real-time detection of EGFR mutation, in order to provide data to guide precise strategy in the following treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.