ArticleZhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer2018
[Applicable Value of AMSS-PCR in Lung Cancer Gene Mutation Detection].
Article in Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mesenchymal-Epithelial Transition Exon 14 Skipping Mutation and Amplification in 5,008 Patients With Lung Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Comparison of Gefitinib in the treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer and clinical effects of Osimertinib and EGFR Gene mutation.Pakistan journal of medical sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe detection of driver oncogenes of lung cancer is of great importance. There are various gene detection techniques nowadays which are different from each other. We carried out this study to investigate the specificity and sensitivity of assay panels based on an Amplification Refractory Mutation System-polymerase chain reaction (ARMS-PCR) technique of Amplification Mutation Specific System (AMSS) in detection of lung cancer gene mutation. To estimate the applicable value of assay panels in clinical settings.
methodsWe collected cancer tissue specimens or fluid specimens from 309 patients. Mutation results were presented for those samples previously detected by ARMS-PCR. In comparison, we carried out AMSS-PCR using (epidermal growth factor receptor, EGFR) assay panel and Six-Alliance assay panel as well as Sanger sequencing. Software SPSS 22.0 (SPSS IBM) was used for statistical analysis.
resultsThe rates of consistency between the results by assay panels and Sanger sequencing or ARMS-PCR were 97.41% and 97.73%, respectively. Besides, EGFR assay panel had higher consistency rates with other detection methods than Six-Alliance assay panel. As for consistency test, the Kappa values of assay panels with Sanger sequencing, assay panels with ARMS-PCR, and ARMS-PCR with Sanger sequencing were 0.946, 0.953, and 0.913, respectively. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) area under curve (AUC) of assay panels was 0.976 referring to Sanger sequencing, and 0.975 as ARMS-PCR was referred to.
conclusionsAMSS-PCR can make an optimal cancer gene mutation detection method for clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.