Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30454046›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2018

Pharmacy students can improve access to quality medicines information by editing Wikipedia articles.

Dorie E Apollonio, Keren Broyde, Amin Azzam, Michael De Guia, James Heilman, Tina Brock

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Citations in Wikipedia for understanding research reach.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Is Medical Education Ready for Universal Open Access to Research?Journal of graduate medical education · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Dorie E ApollonioDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Keren BroydeKing's College London, London, UK.
Amin AzzamDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Michael De GuiaKaiser Permanente, Panorama City, California, USA.
James HeilmanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Tina BrockDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA. tina.brock@monash.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7455-4063
University of California, San Francisco · USKaiser Permanente · USKing's College London · GBUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPharmacy training programs commonly ask students to develop or edit drug monographs that summarize key information about new medicines as an academic exercise. We sought to expand on this traditional approach by having students improve actual medicines information pages posted on Wikipedia.

methodsWe placed students (n = 119) in a required core pharmacy course into groups of four and assigned each group a specific medicines page on Wikipedia to edit. Assigned pages had high hit rates, suggesting that the topics were of interest to the wider public, but were of low quality, suggesting that the topics would benefit from improvement efforts. We provided course trainings about editing Wikipedia. We evaluated the assignment by surveying student knowledge and attitudes and reviewing the edits on Wikipedia.

resultsCompleting the course trainings increased student knowledge of Wikipedia editing practices. At the end of the assignment, students had a more nuanced understanding of Wikipedia as a resource. Student edits improved substantially the quality of the articles edited, their edits were retained for at least 30 days after course completion, and the average number page views of their edited articles increased.

conclusionsOur results suggest that engaging pharmacy students in a Wikipedia editing assignment is a feasible alternative to writing drug monographs as a classroom assignment. Both tasks provide opportunities for students to demonstrate their skills at researching and explaining drug information but only one serves to improve wider access to quality medicines information. Wikipedia editing assignments are feasible for large groups of pharmacy students and effective in improving publicly available information on one of the most heavily accessed websites globally.

Indexed as

Encyclopedias as TopicInternetStudents, PharmacyAttitude of Health PersonnelConsumer Health InformationCurriculumEducation, PharmacyHumansInformation DisseminationWritingCurriculumPharmacyStudents, pharmacyWikipedia

Identifiers

PMID30454046
PMCPMC6245851
OpenAlexW2900828083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.