ArticleBMC cancer2018
Novel risk factors for primary prevention of oesophageal carcinoma: a case-control study from Sri Lanka.
Article in BMC cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk factors of Esophageal Cancer in Punjab- A Case Control Study.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025Article
- LncRNA MAFG-AS1 is involved in human cancer progression.European journal of medical research · 2023Review
- Risk factors for upper limb fractures due to unintentional injuries among adolescents: a case control study from Sri Lanka.BMC public health · 2022Article
- Increased severity of complications after therapeutic ERCP in geriatric patients with chronic pancreatitis: An observational study.Medicine · 2022Observational
- Dietary and Environmental Determinants of Oesophageal Cancer in Arsi Zone, Oromia, Central Ethiopia: A Case-Control Study.Cancer management and research · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOesophageal carcinoma (OC) is one of the leading cancers in Sri Lanka. Its increasing incidence despite the implementation of various preventive activities addressing the conventional risk factors indicates the possibility of the existence of novel, country-specific risk factors. Thus, the identification of novel risk factors of OC specific to Sri Lanka is crucial for implementation of primary prevention activities.
methodsA case-control study was conducted among 49 incident cases of OC recruited from the National Cancer Institute, Maharagama using a non-probability sampling method, and unmatched hospital controls (n = 196) excluded of having OC recruited from the endoscopy unit of the National Hospital of Sri Lanka. Data were collected using an interviewer administered questionnaire. Risk factors for OC were assessed by odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). The risk factors were adjusted for possible confounding by logistic regression analysis.
resultsOf the study population, OC was common among males (69%) and the majority presented with squamous cell carcinoma (65%) at late stages (Stage IV: 45%; Stage III: 37%). Following adjusting for confounders, the risk factor profile for OC included; age > 65 years (OR = 4.0; 95% CI: 1.2-14.2); family history of cancer (OR = 5.04; 95% CI: 1.3-19.0); sub-optimal consumption of dietary fibre (OR = 3.58; 95% CI: 1.1-12.3); sub-optimal consumption of anti-oxidants (OR = 7.0; 95% CI: 2.2-22.5); over-consumption of deep fried food (OR = 6.68; 95% CI:2.0-22.6); 'high risk' alcohol drinking (OR = 11.7; 95% CI: 2.8-49.4); betel quid chewing (OR = 6.1; 95% CI: 2.0, 20.0); 'low' lifetime total sports and exercise activities (MET hours/week/year) (OR = 5.83; 95% CI: 1.5-23.0); agrochemicals exposure (OR = 6.57; 95% CI: 1.4-30.3); pipe-borne drinking water (OR = 5.62; 95% CI:1.7-18.9) and radiation exposure (OR = 4.64; 95% CI: 1.4-15.5). Significant effect modifications were seen between betel quid chewing and male sex (p = 0.01) and between ever exposure to radiation and age over 65 years (p = 0.04).
conclusionsRisk profile for OC includes novel yet modifiable risk factors in relation to diet, occupation, environment and health. Primary prevention should target these to combat OC in Sri Lanka.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.