Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30453987›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2018

Computational prediction of inter-species relationships through omics data analysis and machine learning.

Diogo Manuel Carvalho Leite, Xavier Brochet, Grégory Resch, Yok-Ai Que, Aitana Neves, Carlos Peña-Reyes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Bioinformatics approaches for unveiling virus-host interactions.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Diogo Manuel Carvalho LeiteSchool of Business and Engineering Vaud (HEIG-VD), University of Applied Sciences Western Switzerland (HES-SO), Route. de Cheseaux 1, Yverdon-Les-Bains, 1400, Switzerland.
Xavier BrochetSchool of Business and Engineering Vaud (HEIG-VD), University of Applied Sciences Western Switzerland (HES-SO), Route. de Cheseaux 1, Yverdon-Les-Bains, 1400, Switzerland.
Grégory ReschDepartment of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, 1015, Switzerland.
Yok-Ai QueDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Bern University Hospital (Inselspital), Freiburgstrasse, Bern, 3010, Switzerland.
Aitana NevesSIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Carlos Peña-ReyesSchool of Business and Engineering Vaud (HEIG-VD), University of Applied Sciences Western Switzerland (HES-SO), Route. de Cheseaux 1, Yverdon-Les-Bains, 1400, Switzerland. carlos.pena@heig-vd.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntibiotic resistance and its rapid dissemination around the world threaten the efficacy of currently-used medical treatments and call for novel, innovative approaches to manage multi-drug resistant infections. Phage therapy, i.e., the use of viruses (phages) to specifically infect and kill bacteria during their life cycle, is one of the most promising alternatives to antibiotics. It is based on the correct matching between a target pathogenic bacteria and the therapeutic phage. Nevertheless, correctly matching them is a major challenge. Currently, there is no systematic method to efficiently predict whether phage-bacterium interactions exist and these pairs must be empirically tested in laboratory. Herein, we present our approach for developing a computational model able to predict whether a given phage-bacterium pair can interact based on their genome.

resultsBased on public data from GenBank and phagesDB.org, we collected more than a thousand positive phage-bacterium interactions with their complete genomes. In addition, we generated putative negative (i.e., non-interacting) pairs. We extracted, from the collected genomes, a set of informative features based on the distribution of predictive protein-protein interactions and on their primary structure (e.g. amino-acid frequency, molecular weight and chemical composition of each protein). With these features, we generated multiple candidate datasets to train our algorithms. On this base, we built predictive models exhibiting predictive performance of around 90% in terms of F1-score, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, obtained on the test set with 10-fold cross-validation.

conclusionThese promising results reinforce the hypothesis that machine learning techniques may produce highly-predictive models accelerating the search of interacting phage-bacteria pairs.

Indexed as

Data AnalysisGenomicsMachine LearningAlgorithmsBacteriaBacteriophagesComputational BiologyProteinsSpecies SpecificityProteinsHealthMachine learningPhage-therapySupervised learning

Identifiers

PMID30453987
PMCPMC6245486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.