Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30453966›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2018

Knowledge on voluntary medical male circumcision in a low uptake setting in northern Uganda.

Barbara Marjorie Nanteza, David Serwadda, Edward Nelson Kankaka, Grace Bua Mongo, Ronald Gray, Frederick Edward Makumbi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Barbara Marjorie NantezaDepartment of epidemiology and biostatistics, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda. dr_nanteza@yahoo.co.uk.
David SerwaddaDepartment of epidemiology and biostatistics, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Edward Nelson KankakaRakai Health Sciences Program, Department of Grants, Training & Science, Rakai, Uganda.
Grace Bua MongoRakai Health Sciences Program, Department of Grants, Training & Science, Rakai, Uganda.
Ronald GrayJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public health, Department of Epidemiology, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Frederick Edward MakumbiDepartment of epidemiology and biostatistics, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Rakai Health Sciences Program · UGMakerere University · UGJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

African Population and Health Research Center N/PRakai Health Science Program/ Forgarty Grant N/P
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFree VMMC services have been available in Uganda since 2010. However, uptake in Northern Uganda remains disproportionately low. We aimed to determine if this is due to men's insufficient knowledge on VMMC, and if women's knowledge on VMMC has any association with VMMC status of their male sexual partners.

methodsIn this cross sectional study, participants were asked their circumcision status (or that of their male sexual partner for female respondents) and presented with 14 questions on VMMC benefits, procedure, risk, and misconceptions. Chi square tests or fisher exact tests were used to compare circumcision prevalence among those who gave correct responses versus those who failed to and if p < 0.05, the comparison groups were balanced with propensity score weights in modified poisson models to estimate prevalence ratios, PR.

resultsA total of 396 men and 50 women were included in the analyses. Circumcision was 42% less prevalent among males who failed to reject the misconception that VMMC reduces sexual performance (PR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.38-0.89, p = 0.012), and less prevalent among male sexual partners of females who failed to reject the same misconception (PR = 0.22, 95% CI = 0.07-0.76, p = 0.016). Circumcision was also 35% less prevalent among male respondents who failed to reject the misconception that VMMC increases a man's desire for more sexual partners i.e. promiscuity (PR = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.46-0.92, p = 0.014).

conclusionMisconceptions regarding change in sexual drive or performance were associated with circumcision status in this population, while knowledge of VMMC benefits, risks and procedure was not.

Indexed as

Circumcision, MaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeVoluntary ProgramsAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUgandaYoung AdultCircumcisionKnowledgeMisconceptionSexual functionSub-Saharan AfricaUgandaVMMC

Identifiers

PMID30453966
PMCPMC6245765
OpenAlexW2900882818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.