Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30453960›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2018

Development of mental health indicators at the district level in Madhya Pradesh, India: mixed methods study.

Shalini Ahuja, Petra C Gronholm, Rahul Shidhaye, Mark Jordans, Graham Thornicroft

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The use of indicators for the management of Mental Health Services.Revista latino-americana de enfermagem · 2021
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shalini AhujaCentre for Implementation Science, H3.08 Health Services and Population Research Department, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK. shalini.ahuja@kcl.ac.uk.
Petra C GronholmCentre for Implementation Science, H3.08 Health Services and Population Research Department, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
Rahul ShidhayePublic Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, India.
Mark JordansCentre for Implementation Science, H3.08 Health Services and Population Research Department, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
Graham ThornicroftCentre for Implementation Science, H3.08 Health Services and Population Research Department, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK.

Funding

COBALT: Comorbid Affective Disorders, AIDS/HIV, and Long Term HealthR01MH100470 · NIMH · KING'S COLLEGE LONDON · PI FAIRALL, LARA ROSEMARY, PETERSEN, INGE · 2013 to 2018
$2.0M
Medical Research Council MR/R023697/1Medical Research Council MR/S001255/1NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH100470
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStrengthening routine information systems for mental health can augment scale up of community mental health services in India and other low- and middle-income countries. Currently little routine data is available in Indian settings. This study aimed to develop a core set of indicators for monitoring mental health care in primary health care settings

methodsBy using a sequential exploratory mixed methods design, key mental health indicators measuring service delivery and system performance were developed for the context of Madhya Pradesh, India. The research design involved a situation analysis, and conducting a prioritisation exercise and consultation workshops with key stakeholders.

resultsThis study resulted in nine key mental health indicators covering both mental health service delivery indicators and mental health system indicators for Sehore district of Madhya Pradesh. Mean indicator priority scores ranging from 4.48 to 3.78 were reported.

conclusionsThis study demonstrated a phased approach to strengthen routine information systems for mental health at a primary care level in India. We recommend that similar research methods can be applied across comparable settings and these indicators can be adopted as a part of national routine information systems.

Indexed as

Community Mental Health ServicesDelivery of Health CareFacilities and Services UtilizationHealth Status IndicatorsHumansIndiaInformation SystemsMental DisordersMental HealthMental Health ServicesPrimary Health CareIndiaInformation SystemsMental HealthMental Health Indicators

Identifiers

PMID30453960
PMCPMC6245827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.