Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30453956›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2018

Using conversation analysis to inform role play and simulated interaction in communications skills training for healthcare professionals: identifying avenues for further development through a scoping review.

Alison Pilnick, Diane Trusson, Suzanne Beeke, Rebecca O'Brien, Sarah Goldberg, Rowan H Harwood

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Increasing participation of people with thought disorder in clinical research.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Conversation Analysis Based Simulation (CABS): A method for improving communication skills training for healthcare practitioners.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alison PilnickSchool of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK. Alison.Pilnick@nottingham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0987-8760
Diane TrussonInstitute for Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Suzanne BeekeLanguage and Cognition Research Department, University College London, London, UK.
Rebecca O'BrienSchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Sarah GoldbergSchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Rowan H HarwoodSchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Funding

Department of Health HS&DR/13/114/93Economic and Social Research Council Impact Accelerator Grant IAF0046
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis paper responds to previously published debate in this journal around the use of sociolinguistic methods in communication skills training (CST), which has raised the significant question of how far consultations with simulated patients reflect real clinical encounters. This debate concluded with a suggestion that sociolinguistic methods offer an alternative analytic lens for evaluating CST. We demonstrate here that the utility of sociolinguistic methods in CST is not limited to critique, but also presents an important tool for development and delivery.

methodsFollowing a scoping review of the use of role play and simulated interaction in CST for healthcare professionals, we consider the use of the specific sociolinguistic approach of conversation analysis (CA), which has been applied to the study of health communication in a wide range of settings, as well as to the development of training. DISCUSSION: Role play and simulated interaction have been criticised by both clinicians and sociolinguists for a lack of authenticity as compared to real life interactions. However they contain a number of aspects which healthcare professionals report finding particularly useful: the need to think on one's feet in real time, as in actual interaction with patients; the ability to receive feedback on the simulation; and the ability to watch and reflect on how others approach the same simulation task in real time. Since sociolinguistic approaches can help to identify inauthenticity in role play and simulation, they can also be used to improve authenticity. Analysis of real-life interactions using sociolinguistic methods, and CA in particular, can identify actual interactional practices that are used by particular patient groups. These practices can then be used to inform the training of actors simulating patients. In addition, the emphasis of CA on talk as joint activity means that proper account can be taken of the way in which simulated interaction is co-constructed between simulator and trainee. We suggest that as well as identifying potential weaknesses in current role play and simulation practice, conversation analysis offers the potential to enhance and develop the authenticity of these training methods.

Indexed as

CommunicationEducation, Medical, ContinuingPatient SimulationRole PlayingAttitude of Health PersonnelHealth PersonnelHumansInterpersonal RelationsLanguagePhysician-Patient RelationsProcess Assessment, Health CareProgram DevelopmentCommunications skills trainingConversation analysisRole playSimulated interactionSimulated patient

Identifiers

PMID30453956
PMCPMC6245918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.