Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30453923›Full record

ReviewBMC public health2018

Stigma reduction in relation to HIV test uptake in low- and middle-income countries: a realist review.

Subash Thapa, Karin Hannes, Margaret Cargo, Anne Buve, Sanne Peters, Stephanie Dauphin, Catharina Mathei

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Establishing HIV transmission pathways in Bhutan: a modelling study.The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A Scoping Review of Stigma Related to Prostate Cancer in Black Men.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Subash ThapaResearch Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, 5000, Denmark. soobesh@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1182-8511
Karin HannesSocial Research Methodology Group, Faculty of Social Sciences, KU Leuven, Parkstraat 45, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Margaret CargoHealth Research Institute, University of Canberra, University Drive, 22-B17, Bruce, ACT, 2601, Australia.
Anne BuveDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nationalestraat 155, 2000, Antwerp, Belgium.
Sanne PetersDepartment of Public Health and Primary care, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 33, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Stephanie DauphinDepartment of Public Health and Primary care, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 33, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Catharina MatheiDepartment of Public Health and Primary care, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 33, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis realist review was conducted to understand how stigma is reduced in relation to HIV test uptake in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).

methodsA systematic search of eight databases resulted in 34 articles considered for synthesis. Data synthesis was guided by a preliminary programme theory and included coding the meaning units to develop themes or intervention pathways that corresponded to context-mechanism-outcome configurations.

resultsWe found that the interventions produced an effect through two pathways: (a) knowledge leads to changes in stigmatizing attitudes and increases in HIV test uptake and (b) knowledge and attitudes lead to changes in stigmatizing behaviours and lead to HIV test uptake. We also found one competing pathway that illustrated the direct impact of knowledge on HIV test uptake without changing stigmatizing attitudes and behaviour. The identified pathways were found to be influenced by some structural factors (e.g., anti-homosexuality laws, country-specific HIV testing programmes and policies), community factors (e.g., traditional beliefs and practices, sexual taboos and prevalence of intimate partner violence) and target-population characteristics (e.g., age, income and urban-rural residence).

conclusionsThe pathways and underlying mechanisms support the adaptation of intervention strategies in terms of social context and the target population in LMICs.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesSocial StigmaHIV InfectionsHumansMass ScreeningRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnd stigma reduction interventionsContext-mechanism-outcome configurationsHIV test uptakeLow- and middle-income countriesRealist review

Identifiers

PMID30453923
PMCPMC6245520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.