Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30453917›Full record

SynthesisBMC surgery2018

Use of retrieval bag in the prevention of wound infection in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is it evidence-based? A meta-analysis.

Davide La Regina, Francesco Mongelli, Stefano Cafarotti, Andrea Saporito, Marcello Ceppi, Matteo Di Giuseppe, Antonjacopo Ferrario di Tor Vajana

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07595692 (Tri-Radial Fascial Micro-Incision Technique for Difficult Gallbladder Extraction During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07595692 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Tri-Radial Fascial Micro-Incision Technique for Difficult Gallbladder Extraction During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorBangladesh NavyRan2024 to 2026Enrolled156ConditionsCholelithiasis, Difficult Gallbladder Extraction, Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Surgery, Port-Site Fascial ExtensionArmsVertical Fascial Extension, Horizontal Fascial Extension, Tri-Radial Fascial Micro-Incision
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Clinical Predictive Score for Cholecystectomy Wound Infection: WEBAC Score.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Davide La ReginaDepartment of Surgery, Ospedale Regionale di Bellinzona e Valli, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
Francesco MongelliDepartment of Surgery, Ospedale Regionale di Bellinzona e Valli, Bellinzona, Switzerland. francesco.mongelli@mail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8824-651X
Stefano CafarottiDepartment of Surgery, Ospedale Regionale di Bellinzona e Valli, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
Andrea SaporitoDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Ospedale Regionale di Bellinzona e Valli, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
Marcello CeppiUnit of Clinical Epidemiology, IRCCS - Ospedale San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
Matteo Di GiuseppeDepartment of Surgery, Ospedale Regionale di Bellinzona e Valli, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
Antonjacopo Ferrario di Tor VajanaDepartment of Surgery, Ospedale Regionale di Bellinzona e Valli, Bellinzona, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurgical site infections complicate elective laparoscopic cholecystectomies in 2,4-3,2% of cases. During the operation the gallbladder is commonly extracted with a retrieval bag. We conducted a meta-analysis to clarify whether its use plays a role in preventing infections.

methodsInclusion criteria: elective cholecystectomy, details about the gallbladder extraction and data about local or systemic infection rate. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: cholecystitis, jaundice, concurrent antibiotic therapy, immunosuppression, cancer. A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Cochrane Library and MEDLINE databases was carried out independently by two researchers, according to the PRISMA guidelines and applying the GRADE approach. Terms used were ("gallbladder"AND("speciment"OR"extraction"OR"extract"))OR("gallbladder"OR"cholecystectomy")AND("bag"OR"retrieval|"OR|"endobag"OR"endocatch").

resultsThe comprehensive literature revealed 279 articles. The eligible studies were 2 randomized trials and a multicentre prospective study. Wound infections were documented in 14 on 334 (4,2%) patients operated using a retrieval bag versus 16 on 271 (5,9%) patients operated without the use of a retrieval bag. The statistical analysis revealed a risk ratio (RR) of 0.82 (0.41-1.63 95% CI). Concerning sensitivity analysis the estimated pooled RR ranged from 0.72 to 0.96, both not statistically significant. Harbord test did not reveal the occurrence of small-study effect (p = 0.892) and the funnel-plot showed no noteworthy pattern.

conclusionsThe results of this review highlight the paucity of well-designed large studies and despite limitations related to the low level of evidence, our meta-analysis showed no significant benefit of retrieval bags in reducing the infection rate after elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In absence of acute cholecystitis, accidental intraoperative gallbladder perforation or suspected carcinoma their use, to date, may not be mandatory, so that, further studies focusing on complex cases are needed.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCholecystectomy, LaparoscopicElective Surgical ProceduresGallbladder DiseasesHumansOdds RatioRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSurgical Wound InfectionAnti-Bacterial AgentsCholecystectomyInfectionRetrieval bag

Identifiers

PMID30453917
PMCPMC6245513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.