Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30453878›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2018

Automated selection of homologs to track the evolutionary history of proteins.

Pablo Mier, Antonio J Pérez-Pulido, Miguel A Andrade-Navarro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The 18S ribosomal RNA mEMBO reports · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pablo MierFaculty of Biology, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Hans-Dieter-Hüsch-Weg 15, 55128, Mainz, Germany. munoz@uni-mainz.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3663-2352
Antonio J Pérez-PulidoUniversidad Pablo de Olavide, Sevilla, Spain.
Miguel A Andrade-NavarroFaculty of Biology, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Hans-Dieter-Hüsch-Weg 15, 55128, Mainz, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft AN735/4-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe selection of distant homologs of a query protein under study is a usual and useful application of protein sequence databases. Such sets of homologs are often applied to investigate the function of a protein and the degree to which experimental results can be transferred from one organism to another. In particular, a variety of databases facilitates static browsing for orthologs. However, these resources have a limited power when identifying orthologs between taxonomically distant species. In addition, in some situations, for a given query protein, it is advantageous to compare the sets of orthologs from different specific organisms: this recursive step-wise search might give an idea of the evolutionary path of the protein as a series of consecutive steps, for example gaining or losing domains. However, a step-wise orthology search is a time-consuming task if the number of steps is high.

resultsTo illustrate a solution for this problem, we present the web tool ProteinPathTracker, which allows to track the evolutionary history of a query protein by locating homologs in selected proteomes along several evolutionary paths. Additional functionalities include locking a region of interest to follow its evolution in the discovered homologous sequences and the study of the protein function evolution by analysis of the annotations of the homologs.

conclusionsProteinPathTracker is an easy-to-use web tool that automatises the practice of looking for selected homologs in distant species in a straightforward way for non-expert users.

Indexed as

Databases, ProteinEvolution, MolecularSoftwareHumansProteinsProteomeProteinsProteomeEvolutionary pathHomologyWeb tool

Identifiers

PMID30453878
PMCPMC6245638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.