ArticleJournal of diabetes science and technology2019
Analysis of "Performance of a Factory-Calibrated, Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in Pediatric Participants With Type 1 Diabetes".
Article in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Personalization of continuous glucose monitoring system for diabetic patients in the Polish market in 2024.Pediatric endocrinology, diabetes, and metabolism · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accuracy of sensors play an important role in the acceptance and long-term use of CGM which is related to improved glycemic outcome. This has been lower in children and adolescents in the past for reasons such as size of the device, pain, and necessity to calibrate sensors but also inaccuracy and perceived nonreliability on alarms among others. In the study of Welsh et al, performance of a new, factory-calibrated sensor was assessed. The accuracy of the sensor, as measured in MARD, paired values within 20/20% or 15/15% and surveillance error grid analysis showed very good results, although less so in low value range <70 mg/dL, falling rate of change, and on first day of use. Accurate glucose measurements especially in these incidences are of utmost importance to people with diabetes as their treatment decisions are based on these, also in the beginning of sensor use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.