Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30453762›Full record

ArticleJournal of diabetes science and technology2019

Diabetes on Twitter: A Sentiment Analysis.

Elia Gabarron, Enrique Dorronzoro, Octavio Rivera-Romero, Rolf Wynn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elia Gabarron1 Norwegian Centre for E-health Research, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Enrique Dorronzoro2 Department of Electronic Technology, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain.
Octavio Rivera-Romero2 Department of Electronic Technology, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain.
Rolf Wynn3 Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT-The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundContents published on social media have an impact on individuals and on their decision making. Knowing the sentiment toward diabetes is fundamental to understanding the impact that such information could have on people affected with this health condition and their family members. The objective of this study is to analyze the sentiment expressed in messages on diabetes posted on Twitter.

methodTweets including one of the terms "diabetes," "t1d," and/or "t2d" were extracted for one week using the Twitter standard API. Only the text message and the number of followers of the users were extracted. The sentiment analysis was performed by using SentiStrength.

resultsA total of 67 421 tweets were automatically extracted, of those 3.7% specifically referred to T1D; and 6.8% specifically mentioned T2D. One or more emojis were included in 7.0% of the posts. Tweets specifically mentioning T2D and that did not include emojis were significantly more negative than the tweets that included emojis (-2.22 vs -1.48, P < .001). Tweets on T1D and that included emojis were both significantly more positive and also less negative than tweets without emojis (1.71 vs 1.49 and -1.31 vs -1.50, respectively; P < .005). The number of followers had a negative association with positive sentiment strength ( r = -.023, P < .001) and a positive association with negative sentiment ( r = .016, P < .001).

conclusionThe use of sentiment analysis techniques on social media could increase our knowledge of how social media impact people with diabetes and their families and could help to improve public health strategies.

Indexed as

EmotionsPerceptionSocial MediaAlgorithmsData AccuracyDiabetes MellitusHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInformation DisseminationLife StylePrejudiceReproducibility of Resultsdiabetessentiment analysissocial mediaTwittertype 1 diabetestype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID30453762
PMCPMC6501536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.