ReviewJournal of diabetes science and technology2019
Measures of Accuracy for Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Blood Glucose Monitoring Devices.
Review in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 93 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
93 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 182 citations in OpenAlex.
- Using technology to support diabetes care in hospital: Guidelines from the Joint British Diabetes Societies for Inpatient Care (JBDS-IP) group and Diabetes Technology Network (DTN) UK.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2025Guideline
- Best Time of Day for Strength and Endurance Training to Improve Health and Performance? A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis.Sports medicine - open · 2023Pooled it
- American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update.Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists · 2022Guideline
- Accuracy of continuous glucose monitoring in preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2020Pooled it
- Continuous Glucose Monitors and Automated Insulin Dosing Systems in the Hospital Consensus Guideline.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2020Guideline
- Single-dose dexamethasone increases perioperative glycemic variability in older patients with diabetes undergoing lung surgery: a continuous glucose monitoring-based randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Trial
- Noninvasive Continuous Glucose Monitoring With a Novel Wearable Dial Resonating Sensor: A Clinical Proof-of-Concept Study.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2024Trial
- Within-Person and Between-Sensor Variability in Continuous Glucose Monitoring Metrics.Clinical chemistry · 2023Trial
- An international position statement on practical approaches for inpatient continuous glucose monitoring, insulin pumps and automated insulin delivery systems in adults.Diabetologia · 2026Article
- Deep learning for blood glucose prediction: Reproducibility challenges and factors affecting differential performance.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Trends in accuracy management of continuous glucose monitoring systems.Diabetology international · 2026Review
- Advances in diabetes technology: clinical implications, limitations, and future perspectives.Hormones (Athens, Greece) · 2026Review
- Advances in Electrocardiogram-Based Non-Invasive Blood Glucose Monitoring Technology.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Review
- Challenges of Wearable Biosensors and Ways to Overcome Them.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Letter to the Editor regarding "Accuracy and Reliability of the Sinocare iCan i3 Continuous Glucose Monitoring System".Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2026Article
- Wearable Sensors for Health Monitoring.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Reducing bias and enhancing equity in AI-enabled precision nutrition: addressing measurement error across wearables, multiomics, and dietary data.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- Toward standardized continuous glucose monitoring validation: lessons from the Sinocare iCan i3 accuracy study.Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare · 2026Article
- Accuracy and Clinical Safety of the FreeStyle Libre 2 System in an Internal Medicine Intermediate Care Unit.Cureus · 2026Article
- Artificial pancreas: the past and the future.Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2025Review
33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Currently, patients with diabetes may choose between two major types of system for glucose measurement: blood glucose monitoring (BGM) systems measuring glucose within capillary blood and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems measuring glucose within interstitial fluid. Although BGM and CGM systems offer different functionality, both types of system are intended to help users achieve improved glucose control. Another area in which BGM and CGM systems differ is measurement accuracy. In the literature, BGM system accuracy is assessed mainly according to ISO 15197:2013 accuracy requirements, whereas CGM accuracy has hitherto mainly been assessed by MARD, although often results from additional analyses such as bias analysis or error grid analysis are provided. The intention of this review is to provide a comparison of different approaches used to determine the accuracy of BGM and CGM systems and factors that should be considered when using these different measures of accuracy to make comparisons between the analytical performance (ie, accuracy) of BGM and CGM systems. In addition, real-world implications of accuracy and its relevance are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.