ArticleCancer research and treatment2019
Development of Web-Based Nomograms to Predict Treatment Response and Prognosis of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.
Article in Cancer research and treatment, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation for prognostic nomogram of epithelial ovarian cancer recurrence based on circulating tumor cells and epithelial-mesenchymal transition.Scientific reports · 2021Trial
- Development of predictive models for the prognosis of triple-negative breast cancer using multiple transcriptomic analyses.PloS one · 2026Article
- Exploring the potential effects of acute respiratory failure on patients with early-stage bronchopulmonary cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Comprehensive analyses of mitophagy-related genes and mitophagy-related lncRNAs for patients with ovarian cancer.BMC women's health · 2024Article
- Peripheral and tumor-infiltrating immune cells are correlated with patient outcomes in ovarian cancer.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- Novel prognostic nomograms to assess survival in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma after surgery and chemotherapy: a retrospective cohort study from SEER database.Annals of translational medicine · 2022Article
- Construction and validation of a transcription factors-based prognostic signature for ovarian cancer.Journal of ovarian research · 2022Article
- Toward More Comprehensive Homologous Recombination Deficiency Assays in Ovarian Cancer Part 2: Medical Perspectives.Cancers · 2022Review
- Prognostic nomogram that predicts progression-free survival and overall survival of patients with ovarian clear cell carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Predicting preterm birth through vaginal microbiota, cervical length, and WBC using a machine learning model.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and early prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus using machine learning methods.Clinical and molecular hepatology · 2022Observational
- Prediction Models for the Clinical Severity of Patients With COVID-19 in Korea: Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
- Development of Machine Learning Models to Predict Platinum Sensitivity of High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma.Cancers · 2021Article
- M2 Macrophage-Based Prognostic Nomogram for Gastric Cancer After Surgical Resection.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeDiscovery of models predicting the exact prognosis of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is necessary as the first step of implementation of individualized treatment. This study aimed to develop nomograms predicting treatment response and prognosis in EOC. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe comprehensively reviewed medical records of 866 patients diagnosed with and treated for EOC at two tertiary institutional hospitals between 2007 and 2016. Patients' clinico-pathologic characteristics, details of primary treatment, intra-operative surgical findings, and survival outcomes were collected. To construct predictive nomograms for platinum sensitivity, 3-year progression-free survival (PFS), and 5-year overall survival (OS), we performed stepwise variable selection by measuring the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with leave-one-out cross-validation. For model validation, 10-fold cross-validation was applied.
resultsThe median length of observation was 42.4 months (interquartile range, 25.7 to 69.9 months), during which 441 patients (50.9%) experienced disease recurrence. The median value of PFS was 32.6 months and 3-year PFS rate was 47.8% while 5-year OS rate was 68.4%. The AUCs of the newly developed nomograms predicting platinum sensitivity, 3-year PFS, and 5-year OS were 0.758, 0.841, and 0.805, respectively. We also developed predictive nomograms confined to the patients who underwent primary debulking surgery. The AUCs for platinum sensitivity, 3-year PFS, and 5-year OS were 0.713, 0.839, and 0.803, respectively.
conclusionWe successfully developed nomograms predicting treatment response and prognosis of patients with EOC. These nomograms are expected to be useful in clinical practice and designing clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.