ReviewNutrients2018
Descriptive Study of the Different Tools Used to Evaluate the Adherence to a Gluten-Free Diet in Celiac Disease Patients.
Review in Nutrients, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Clinical and Histopathological Profile of Adults with Celiac Disease at Diagnosis and on a Gluten-Free Diet: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study.Clinics and practice · 2026Article
- Testing for Faecal Gluten Immunogenic Peptides: Is It Useful to Evaluate Adherence to Gluten-Free Diet?Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2025Article
- The follow-up of patients with celiac disease.Journal of translational autoimmunity · 2025Review
- Dietary assessments in individuals living with coeliac disease: key considerations.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025Review
- Gluten-Free Diet and Health-Related Quality of Life: The Validated Hellenic Version of the Celiac Dietary Adherence Test.Nutrients · 2025Article
- Effect of Gluten-Free Diet on Metabolic Control and Growth Parameters Among Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes During the First Year After Diagnosis of Celiac Disease: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.Pediatric diabetes · 2025Article
- [Adherence factors to the gluten-free diet in people with celiac disease in Paraguay]Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Medicas (Cordoba, Argentina) · 2024Observational
- Past, Present, and Future of Noninvasive Tests to Assess Gluten Exposure, Celiac Disease Activity, and End-Organ Damage.Gastroenterology · 2024Review
- Gluten-Free Diet and Other Celiac Disease Therapies: Current Understanding and Emerging Strategies.Nutrients · 2024Review
- More Than Three Years for Normalisation of Routine Laboratory Values after Gluten Withdrawal in Paediatric Coeliac Patients.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The Gluten-Free Diet for Celiac Disease: Critical Insights to Better Understand Clinical Outcomes.Nutrients · 2023Review
- The influence of a gluten-free diet on health-related quality of life in individuals with celiac disease.BMC gastroenterology · 2021Article
- Review
- Challenges of Monitoring the Gluten-Free Diet Adherence in the Management and Follow-Up of Patients with Celiac Disease.Nutrients · 2021Review
- Adherence to Gluten-Free Diet in Coeliac Paediatric Patients Assessed through a Questionnaire Positively Influences Growth and Quality of Life.Nutrients · 2020Observational
- The Predictive Value of Serum Cytokines for Distinguishing Celiac Disease from Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity and Healthy SubjectsIranian biomedical journal · 2020Article
- Gluten Rhapsody.Nutrients · 2019Article
- Testing for fecal gluten immunogenic peptides: a useful tool to evaluate compliance with gluten-free diet by celiacs.Annals of gastroenterologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Celiac disease (CD) is a genetically conditioned autoimmune process that appears in susceptible people. It can affect people of any age, and slightly predominates in females. It has a fairly homogenous global distribution, with an average prevalence of 1⁻2%, the frequency having increased in recent decades. The only effective treatment is a strict and permanent gluten-free diet (GFD), although the level of compliance is poor, at about 50% of cases. To monitor the effectiveness of the GFD, several procedures involving various approaches are employed: (a) Periodic visits by expert Nutritionists; (b) Clinical follow-up; (c) Serological time controls of specific antibodies; (d) Serial endoscopies with collection of duodenal biopsies; (e) Use of structured questionnaires; and (f) Determination of gluten peptides derived from gluten in faeces and/or urine. All of these procedures are useful when applied, alone or in combination, depending on the cases. Some patients will only need to consult to their doctors, while others will require a multidisciplinary approach to assess their compliance with the GFD. In children, normalization of duodenal mucosa was achieved in 95% of cases within two years, while it is more delayed in adults, whose mucosa take longer time (3⁻5 years) to heal completely.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.