ArticleNeurosurgical focus2018
Outcome prediction of intracranial aneurysm treatment by flow diverters using machine learning.
Article in Neurosurgical focus, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 101 citations in OpenAlex.
- What can we learn from machine learning studies on flow diverter aneurysm embolization? A systematic review.Journal of neurointerventional surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Classification, detection, and segmentation performance of image-based AI in intracranial aneurysm: a systematic review.BMC medical imaging · 2024Pooled it
- Implementation of computer simulation to assess flow diversion treatment outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of neurointerventional surgery · 2021Pooled it
- Systematic Review of Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence in Intracranial Aneurysm Management.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of NeuroimagingPooled it
- Artificial Intelligence for Cerebral Aneurysm Management: Integrating Imaging, Hemodynamics, and Clinical Decision Support.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Review
- Clinical outcome prediction of Contour Neurovascular System treatment based on pre-treatment geometric and hemodynamic characteristics.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026Article
- Hemodynamic effect of coil packing density after tubridge flow diverter for anterior circulation small and medium-sized aneurysms.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Application of machine learning algorithms to predict and assess factors related to internal carotid siphon aneurysm occlusion treated with flow diversion.Neuroradiology · 2026Article
- A Machine learning pipeline to investigate tissue ingrowth in cerebral aneurysms using preclinical animal models.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Predictors of Outcome Clusters in Patients With Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Treated With Microsurgery: An Unsupervised Machine Learning Analysis.Neurosurgery practice · 2026Article
- Development of a Computationally Efficient CFD Method for Blood Flow Analysis Following Flow Diverter Stent Deployment and Its Application to Treatment Planning.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Imaging of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Review of Standard and Advanced Imaging Techniques.Translational stroke research · 2025Review
- Hemodynamics in Cerebral Aneurysms and Parent Arteries With Incompletely Expanded Flow Diverter Stents.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Prediction and SHAP Analysis Integrating Morphological and Hemodynamic Parameters for Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm Occlusion After Flow Diverter Treatment.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence for Patient Safety and Surgical Education in Neurosurgery.JMA journal · 2025Review
- Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Clinical Outcomes in Microsurgical Clipping Treatments of Cerebral Aneurysms.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Impact Exploration of Spatiotemporal Feature Derivation and Selection on Machine Learning-Based Predictive Models for Post-Embolization Cerebral Aneurysm Recanalization.Cardiovascular engineering and technology · 2024Article
- A comprehensive investigation of morphological features responsible for cerebral aneurysm rupture using machine learning.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The new era of artificial intelligence in neuroradiology: current research and promising tools.Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
OBJECTIVEFlow diverters (FDs) are designed to occlude intracranial aneurysms (IAs) while preserving flow to essential arteries. Incomplete occlusion exposes patients to risks of thromboembolic complications and rupture. A priori assessment of FD treatment outcome could enable treatment optimization leading to better outcomes. To that end, the authors applied image-based computational analysis to clinically FD-treated aneurysms to extract information regarding morphology, pre- and post-treatment hemodynamics, and FD-device characteristics and then used these parameters to train machine learning algorithms to predict 6-month clinical outcomes after FD treatment.METHODSData were retrospectively collected for 84 FD-treated sidewall aneurysms in 80 patients. Based on 6-month angiographic outcomes, IAs were classified as occluded (n = 63) or residual (incomplete occlusion, n = 21). For each case, the authors modeled FD deployment using a fast virtual stenting algorithm and hemodynamics using image-based computational fluid dynamics. Sixteen morphological, hemodynamic, and FD-based parameters were calculated for each aneurysm. Aneurysms were randomly assigned to a training or testing cohort in approximately a 3:1 ratio. The Student t-test and Mann-Whitney U-test were performed on data from the training cohort to identify significant parameters distinguishing the occluded from residual groups. Predictive models were trained using 4 types of supervised machine learning algorithms: logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM; linear and Gaussian kernels), K-nearest neighbor, and neural network (NN). In the testing cohort, the authors compared outcome prediction by each model trained using all parameters versus only the significant parameters.RESULTSThe training cohort (n = 64) consisted of 48 occluded and 16 residual aneurysms and the testing cohort (n = 20) consisted of 15 occluded and 5 residual aneurysms. Significance tests yielded 2 morphological (ostium ratio and neck ratio) and 3 hemodynamic (pre-treatment inflow rate, post-treatment inflow rate, and post-treatment aneurysm averaged velocity) discriminants between the occluded (good-outcome) and the residual (bad-outcome) group. In both training and testing, all the models trained using all 16 parameters performed better than all the models trained using only the 5 significant parameters. Among the all-parameter models, NN (AUC = 0.967) performed the best during training, followed by LR and linear SVM (AUC = 0.941 and 0.914, respectively). During testing, NN and Gaussian-SVM models had the highest accuracy (90%) in predicting occlusion outcome.CONCLUSIONSNN and Gaussian-SVM models incorporating all 16 morphological, hemodynamic, and FD-related parameters predicted 6-month occlusion outcome of FD treatment with 90% accuracy. More robust models using the computational workflow and machine learning could be trained on larger patient databases toward clinical use in patient-specific treatment planning and optimization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.