Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30453461›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgical focus2018

Outcome prediction of intracranial aneurysm treatment by flow diverters using machine learning.

Nikhil Paliwal, Prakhar Jaiswal, Vincent M Tutino, Hussain Shallwani, Jason M Davies, Adnan H Siddiqui, Rahul Rai, Hui Meng

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgical focus, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Systematic Review of Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence in Intracranial Aneurysm Management.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging
    Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Hemodynamics in Cerebral Aneurysms and Parent Arteries With Incompletely Expanded Flow Diverter Stents.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nikhil PaliwalDepartments of1Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering.
Prakhar JaiswalDepartments of1Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering.
Vincent M Tutino2Canon Stroke and Vascular Research Center, University at Buffalo, the State University of New York, Buffalo, New York.
Hussain Shallwani3Neurosurgery.
Jason M Davies3Neurosurgery.
Adnan H Siddiqui2Canon Stroke and Vascular Research Center, University at Buffalo, the State University of New York, Buffalo, New York.
Rahul RaiDepartments of1Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering.
Hui MengDepartments of1Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering.
University at Buffalo, State University of New York · USNeurology, Inc · US

Funding

University of Buffalo Clinical and Translational Science Institute - Supplement SchulyerUL1TR001412 · NCATS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI MURPHY, TIMOTHY F · 2015 to 2024
$33.8M
Institutional Career DevelopmentKL2TR001413 · NCATS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI DUBOCOVICH, MARGARITA L · 2015 to 2024
$4.2M
Virtual Intervention of Intracranial AneurysmsR01NS091075 · NINDS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI MENG, HUI · 2015 to 2019
$1.7M
AView: A Bedside Simulation Tool for Neurovascular InterventionR03NS090193 · NINDS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI MENG, HUI · 2015 to 2016
$157k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001413NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001412NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS091075NINDS NIH HHS R03 NS090193
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

OBJECTIVEFlow diverters (FDs) are designed to occlude intracranial aneurysms (IAs) while preserving flow to essential arteries. Incomplete occlusion exposes patients to risks of thromboembolic complications and rupture. A priori assessment of FD treatment outcome could enable treatment optimization leading to better outcomes. To that end, the authors applied image-based computational analysis to clinically FD-treated aneurysms to extract information regarding morphology, pre- and post-treatment hemodynamics, and FD-device characteristics and then used these parameters to train machine learning algorithms to predict 6-month clinical outcomes after FD treatment.METHODSData were retrospectively collected for 84 FD-treated sidewall aneurysms in 80 patients. Based on 6-month angiographic outcomes, IAs were classified as occluded (n = 63) or residual (incomplete occlusion, n = 21). For each case, the authors modeled FD deployment using a fast virtual stenting algorithm and hemodynamics using image-based computational fluid dynamics. Sixteen morphological, hemodynamic, and FD-based parameters were calculated for each aneurysm. Aneurysms were randomly assigned to a training or testing cohort in approximately a 3:1 ratio. The Student t-test and Mann-Whitney U-test were performed on data from the training cohort to identify significant parameters distinguishing the occluded from residual groups. Predictive models were trained using 4 types of supervised machine learning algorithms: logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM; linear and Gaussian kernels), K-nearest neighbor, and neural network (NN). In the testing cohort, the authors compared outcome prediction by each model trained using all parameters versus only the significant parameters.RESULTSThe training cohort (n = 64) consisted of 48 occluded and 16 residual aneurysms and the testing cohort (n = 20) consisted of 15 occluded and 5 residual aneurysms. Significance tests yielded 2 morphological (ostium ratio and neck ratio) and 3 hemodynamic (pre-treatment inflow rate, post-treatment inflow rate, and post-treatment aneurysm averaged velocity) discriminants between the occluded (good-outcome) and the residual (bad-outcome) group. In both training and testing, all the models trained using all 16 parameters performed better than all the models trained using only the 5 significant parameters. Among the all-parameter models, NN (AUC = 0.967) performed the best during training, followed by LR and linear SVM (AUC = 0.941 and 0.914, respectively). During testing, NN and Gaussian-SVM models had the highest accuracy (90%) in predicting occlusion outcome.CONCLUSIONSNN and Gaussian-SVM models incorporating all 16 morphological, hemodynamic, and FD-related parameters predicted 6-month occlusion outcome of FD treatment with 90% accuracy. More robust models using the computational workflow and machine learning could be trained on larger patient databases toward clinical use in patient-specific treatment planning and optimization.

Indexed as

HydrodynamicsMachine LearningSelf Expandable Metallic StentsAgedEmbolization, TherapeuticFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntracranial AneurysmMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAR = aspect ratioAUC = area under the ROC curveAV = averaged velocityCFD = computational fluid dynamicscomputational fluid dynamicsDSA = digital subtraction angiographyFD = flow diverterflow diverterIA = intracranial aneurysmICA = internal carotid arteryintracranial aneurysmIR = inflow rateK-NN = K-nearest neighborLR = logistic regressionmachine learningMCR = metal coverage rateML = machine learningND = neck diameterNN = neural networkNR = neck ratioOsR = ostium ratioPD = pore densityPED = Pipeline embolization devicePipeline embolization devicepredictive modelsROC = receiver operating characteristicSE = standard errorSHR = shear rateSR = size ratioSVM = support vector machineTT = turnover time

Identifiers

PMID30453461
PMCPMC6421840
OpenAlexW2901796283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.