Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30453333›Full record

ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2018

Sensitivity to Morphosyntactic Information in Preschool Children With and Without Developmental Language Disorder: A Follow-Up Study.

Patricia Deevy, Laurence B Leonard

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Artificial Grammar Learning in Children With Developmental Language Disorder.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Using Computerized Language Analysis to Evaluate Grammatical Skills.Language, speech, and hearing services in schools · 2020
    Article
  8. Subject-Aux Inversion in Children with SLI.Journal of psycholinguistic research · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Patricia DeevyPurdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Laurence B LeonardPurdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Purdue University West Lafayette · US

Funding

Sensitivity to Morphological Cues in Children with Specific Language ImpairmentR21DC013334 · NIDCD · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI LEONARD, LAURENCE BAKER · 2013 to 2014
$424k
NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC013334
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study tested children's sensitivity to tense/agreement information in fronted auxiliaries during online comprehension of questions (e.g., Are the nice little dogs running?). Data from children with developmental language disorder (DLD) were compared to previously published data from typically developing (TD) children matched according to sentence comprehension test scores. Method: Fifteen 5-year-old children with DLD and fifteen 3-year-old TD children participated in a looking-while-listening task. Children viewed pairs of pictures, 1 with a single agent and 1 with multiple agents, accompanied by a sentence with a fronted auxiliary (is + single agent or are + two agents) or a control sentence. Proportion looking to the target was measured. Results: Children with DLD did not show anticipatory looking based on the number information contained in the auxiliary (is or are) as the younger TD children had. Both groups showed significant increases in looking to the target upon hearing the subject noun (e.g., dogs). Conclusions: Despite the groups' similar sentence comprehension abilities and ability to accurately respond to the information provided by the subject noun, children with DLD did not show sensitivity to number information on the fronted auxiliary. This insensitivity is considered in light of these children's weaker command of tense/agreement forms in their speech. Specifically, we consider the possibility that failure to grasp the relation between the subject-verb sequence (e.g., dogs running) and preceding information (e.g., are) in questions in the input contributes to the protracted inconsistency in producing auxiliary forms in obligatory contexts by children with DLD. Supplemental Material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.7283459.

Indexed as

Child LanguageComprehensionLinguisticsSemanticsChild, PreschoolFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLanguage Development DisordersLanguage TestsMale

Identifiers

PMID30453333
PMCPMC6440306
OpenAlexW2901513309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.