Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30453088›Full record

ArticleBone2019

Bone remodeling following MR-guided focused ultrasound: Evaluation with HR-pQCT and FTIR.

Matthew D Bucknor, Harsh Goel, Courtney Pasco, Andrew E Horvai, Galateia J Kazakia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew D BucknorDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, 185 Berry Street, Suite 350, San Francisco, CA 94107-5705, United States. Electronic address: matthew.bucknor@ucsf.edu.
Harsh GoelDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, 185 Berry Street, Suite 350, San Francisco, CA 94107-5705, United States.
Courtney PascoDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, 185 Berry Street, Suite 350, San Francisco, CA 94107-5705, United States.
Andrew E HorvaiDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, 185 Berry Street, Suite 350, San Francisco, CA 94107-5705, United States.
Galateia J KazakiaDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, 185 Berry Street, Suite 350, San Francisco, CA 94107-5705, United States.
Berry (United States) · USUniversity of California System · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Biomedical Imaging for Clinician ScientistsT32EB001631 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI THOMAS M LINK · 2005 to 2026
$5.6M
UCSF Core Center for Musculoskeletal Biology and MedicineP30AR066262 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LOTZ, JEFFREY C. · 2014 to 2018
$3.0M
NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR066262NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB001631
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) is a novel non-invasive ablation technique that uses focused sound energy to destroy focal tumors, primarily via heat deposition. It is widely used for palliation of pain from bone metastases and has also recently gained popularity as a technique for ablation of benign bone tumors and facet degenerative joint disease (rhizotomy). Clinically, in a subset of patients who have undergone MRgFUS of bone, a variety of treatment responses have been noted on follow-up imaging, including focal sclerosis within the target lesion or more exuberant proliferative changes associated with the periosteum. In this study, high resolution peripheral quantitative CT (HR-pQCT) was used to evaluate remodeling of bone following ablation in a swine model of MRgFUS and compared to samples from a control, non-treated femur. Within each treated femur, two lesions were created: a higher energy focused ultrasound dose was used for one lesion compared to a lower energy dose for the second lesion. Exuberant, extra-cortical bone formation was detected at the higher energy ablation zones, with volumes ranging from 340 mm

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingTomography, X-Ray ComputedUltrasonographyAnimalsBone RemodelingFemaleOsteogenesisSpectroscopy, Fourier Transform InfraredSwineAblationFourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR)High intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU)High resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomographyMagnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS)

Identifiers

PMID30453088
PMCPMC6360100
OpenAlexW2900496095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.