Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30452746›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of audiology2018

Empowering Senior Cochlear Implant Users at Home via a Tablet Computer Application.

Birgit Philips, Cas Smits, Paul J Govaerts, Inge Doorn, Filiep Vanpoucke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of audiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Our experience with home self-assessment of speech recognition in the care pathway of 10 newly implanted adult cochlear implant users.Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Birgit PhilipsCochlear Technology Center, Mechelen, Belgium.
Cas SmitsDepartment of Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, Section Ear & Hearing, and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center, the Netherlands.
Paul J GovaertsThe Eargroup, Antwerp-Deurne, Belgium.
Inge DoornOnafhankelijk Platform voor Cochleaire Implantatie, GA Houten, the Netherlands.
Filiep VanpouckeCochlear Technology Center, Mechelen, Belgium.
Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NL

Funding

Third International Meeting on Internet and AudiologyR13DC016547 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI PREMINGER, JILL E · 2017 to 2017
$34k
NIDCD NIH HHS R13 DC016547
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe introduction of connectivity technologies in hearing implants allows new ways to support cochlear implant (CI) users remotely. Some functionalities and services that are traditionally only available in an in-clinic care model can now also be accessed at home. This study explores the feasibility of a prototype of a tablet computer application (MyHearingApp [MHA]) in a group of senior experienced CI users at home, evaluating usability and user motivation.

methodBased on user feedback, a tablet computer application (MHA) for the Cochlear Nucleus 6 CP910 sound processor was designed implementing six different functionalities: (a) My Hearing Tests, (b) My Environment, (c) My Hearing Journey, (d) Tip of the Day, (e) Recipient Portal, and (f) Program Use and Events. The clinical evaluation design was a prospective study of the MHA in 16 senior experienced CI users. During 4 weeks, participants could freely explore the functionalities. At the end, the usability and their motivation for uptake and adherence were measured using a baseline and follow-up questionnaire.

resultsBased on the System Usability Score (as part of the follow-up questionnaire), a good level of usability was indicated (M = 75.6, range: 62.5-92.5, SD = 8.6). The ability to perform hearing tests at home is ranked as the most relevant functionality within the MHA. According to the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (Deci, Eghrari, Patrick, & Leone, 1994) questionnaire (as part of the follow-up questionnaire), participants reported high levels of interest and enjoyment, found themselves competent, and did not experience pressure while working with the app.

conclusionsThis study evaluated a tablet computer application (MHA) for experienced senior CI users by means of a prospective design, which provided novel insights into delivering CI care into the home of the CI user. The user feedback from this small-scale study suggests that the participants are open to take more responsibility for and to become a more active actor in their own hearing care, if only this is facilitated with the right tools. This may foster the evolution from a clinic-led to a more patient-centered care model, where CI users feel more empowered in the self-management of their hearing implant device.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantsComputers, HandheldMobile ApplicationsAgedAged, 80 and overDeafnessFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient ParticipationProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID30452746
PMCPMC7018449
OpenAlexW2900649039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.