Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30451517›Full record

Trial reportPsychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors2018

Profiles of behavior change constructs for reducing alcohol use in women at risk of an alcohol-exposed pregnancy.

Kirk von Sternberg, Carlo C DiClemente, Mary M Velasquez

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Examining replicability in addictions research: How to assess and ways forward.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kirk von SternbergHealth Behavior Research and Training Institute, The University of Texas at Austin.
Carlo C DiClementeDepartment of Psychology, University of Maryland, Baltimore County.
Mary M VelasquezHealth Behavior Research and Training Institute, The University of Texas at Austin.

Funding

CHOICES+: Preconception approach to reducing alcohol & tobacco-exposed pregnancyU84DD000438 · DD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI VELASQUEZ, MARY MARDEN · 2008 to 2011
$2.0M
Centers for Disease Control and PreventionNCBDD CDC HHS U84 DD000438
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using data from Project CHOICES, a randomized controlled trial to test an intervention to prevent alcohol-exposed pregnancies, this study examined process of change profiles composed of Transtheoretical Model of Change (TTM) constructs for alcohol. The primary purpose was to identify a profile of TTM variables associated with reduced drinking. Participants (n = 570) were women at risk of an alcohol-exposed pregnancy recruited from high risk settings. Profile analyses compared end-of-treatment (i.e., 3 months postintake) TTM construct mean profiles for women who reduced drinking to below NIAAA-defined risk levels1 (changers) with women who continued to drink at risk levels (nonchangers) at the 9-month follow-up. TTM construct profiles included experiential and behavioral processes of change, pros and cons for change, confidence to reduce drinking, and temptation to drink above risk levels. Results revealed a parallelism effect or interaction (p < .001) in the end-of-treatment TTM construct profiles for the changers versus the nonchangers at the 9-month follow-up. Changers reported greater pros (p < .001) and lower cons for change (p = .012), greater confidence (p = .030), lower temptation (p < .001) and greater use of the experiential (p < .001) and behavioral processes of change (p < .001). A larger percentage of the women from the CHOICES intervention were in the end-of-treatment profile of the changers (48%) compared with the control condition (39%; p = .042). Interventions can potentially be enhanced by clinicians' understanding what successful change "looks like" for specific clients in terms of their process use, decisional balance, and self-efficacy, allowing for tailored interventions targeted to each client's specific strengths and deficits. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

MotivationSelf EfficacyAdultAlcohol DrinkingDecision MakingFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesPregnancyPregnant People

Identifiers

PMID30451517
PMCPMC6314297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.