Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30451345›Full record

ReviewJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2019

Quantitative imaging biomarkers alliance (QIBA) recommendations for improved precision of DWI and DCE-MRI derived biomarkers in multicenter oncology trials.

Amita Shukla-Dave, Nancy A Obuchowski, Thomas L Chenevert, Sachin Jambawalikar, Lawrence H Schwartz, Dariya Malyarenko, Wei Huang, Susan M Noworolski, Robert J Young, Mark S Shiroishi and 7 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 241 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
241citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
20.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

241 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 389 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. A systematic review of the role of quantitative CT in the prognostication and disease monitoring of interstitial lung disease.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Simultaneous TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2026
    Article
  8. The Next Frontier in Quantitative Co-Clinical Imaging to Advance Functional Precision Oncology.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Observational
  20. Article

181 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 14 institutions in 3 countries.

Amita Shukla-DaveDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Nancy A ObuchowskiDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Thomas L ChenevertDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Sachin JambawalikarDepartment of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Lawrence H SchwartzDepartment of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Dariya MalyarenkoDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Wei HuangAdvanced Imaging Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Susan M NoworolskiDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Robert J YoungDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Mark S ShiroishiDivision of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Harrison KimDepartment of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Catherine CoolensDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.
Hendrik LaueDepartment of Fraunhofer MEVIS, Bremen, Germany.
Caroline ChungDepartment of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Mark RosenDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Michael BossApplied Physics Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
Edward F JacksonDepartments of Medical Physics, Radiology, and Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USFraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine · DENational Institute of Standards and Technology · USOregon Health & Science University · USPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CAThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of California System · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Southern California · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · USZero to Three · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Translational Research Central ServicesP30CA006973 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAM George NELSON · 1985 to 2026
$208.6M
XRAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA013148 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Robert S Welner · 1985 to 2026
$165.9M
Southern California Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR001855 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Thomas A Buchanan, Michele D. Kipke · 2016 to 2026
$81.3M
QUANTITATION OF HUMAN BRAIN TUMOR THERAPY RESPONSE BY MRP01CA085878 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ROSS, BRIAN D. · 2001 to 2017
$31.9M
Elimination of Instrumental Bias for Quantitative Diffusion Imaging in Clinical Oncology TrialsR01CA190299 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MALYARENKO, DARIYA I. · 2015 to 2025
$6.4M
Multi-Modality Quantitiative Imaging for Evaluation of Response to Cancer TherapyU01CA140204 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DU, YONG, SOLNES, LILJA · 2011 to 2022
$6.1M
Quantitative DW-MRI for Early Breast Cancer Treatment Response AssessmentU01CA166104 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CHENEVERT, THOMAS L, GALBAN, CRAIG J · 2012 to 2019
$4.1M
Quantitative imaging tools to derive DW-MRI oncological biomarkersU01CA211205 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI DAVE, AMITA, SCHWARTZ, LAWRENCE H · 2017 to 2021
$3.4M
Shutter-Speed Model DCE-MRI for Assessment of Response to Cancer TherapyU01CA154602 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI HUANG, WEI, RYAN, CHRISTOPHER WALTER · 2011 to 2015
$2.9M
Southern California Clinical and Translational Science InstituteKL2TR000131 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI BUCHANAN, THOMAS A · 2012 to 2015
$2.1M
DCE MRI to Improve Prostate Cancer Identification and CharacterizationR01CA148708 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI NOWOROLSKI, SUSAN M · 2010 to 2014
$1.3M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000131NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001855NCI NIH HHS L30 CA209248NCI NIH HHS P01 CA085878NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006973NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P30 CA013148NCI NIH HHS R01 CA148708NCI NIH HHS R01 CA190299NCI NIH HHS U01 CA140204NCI NIH HHS U01 CA154602NCI NIH HHS U01 CA166104NCI NIH HHS U01 CA211205NHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201500021CNIBIB NIH HHS HHSN268201000050CNIBIB NIH HHS HHSN268201300071C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physiological properties of tumors can be measured both in vivo and noninvasively by diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Although these techniques have been used for more than two decades to study tumor diffusion, perfusion, and/or permeability, the methods and studies on how to reduce measurement error and bias in the derived imaging metrics is still lacking in the literature. This is of paramount importance because the objective is to translate these quantitative imaging biomarkers (QIBs) into clinical trials, and ultimately in clinical practice. Standardization of the image acquisition using appropriate phantoms is the first step from a technical performance standpoint. The next step is to assess whether the imaging metrics have clinical value and meet the requirements for being a QIB as defined by the Radiological Society of North America's Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance (QIBA). The goal and mission of QIBA and the National Cancer Institute Quantitative Imaging Network (QIN) initiatives are to provide technical performance standards (QIBA profiles) and QIN tools for producing reliable QIBs for use in the clinical imaging community. Some of QIBA's development of quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced QIB profiles has been hampered by the lack of literature for repeatability and reproducibility of the derived QIBs. The available research on this topic is scant and is not in sync with improvements or upgrades in MRI technology over the years. This review focuses on the need for QIBs in oncology applications and emphasizes the importance of the assessment of their reproducibility and repeatability. Level of Evidence: 5 Technical Efficacy Stage: 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:e101-e121.

Indexed as

BiomarkersAdultAgedBrainClinical Trials as TopicContrast MediaDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleHumansLiverMaleMedical OncologyMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicNeoplasmsNeuroimagingBiomarkersContrast MediaDCEDWIMRIquantitative imaging biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID30451345
PMCPMC6526078
OpenAlexW2901253186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.