Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30451079›Full record

ReviewCognitive neuroscience

Little evidence for Fast Mapping (FM) in adults: A review and discussion.

Elisa Cooper, Andrea Greve, Richard N Henson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cognitive neuroscience. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The cognitive neuroscience of memory representations.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Vocal communication across cultures: theoretical and methodological issues.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Perirhinal circuits for memory processing.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elisa Coopera Medical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge , Cambridge , UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3259-4408
Andrea Grevea Medical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge , Cambridge , UK.
Richard N Hensona Medical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge , Cambridge , UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U105579226Medical Research Council MC_UU_00005/8Medical Research Council SUAG/010/RG91365
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional memory theory proposes that the hippocampus is initially responsible for encoding new information, before this responsibility is gradually transferred to the neocortex. Therefore, a report in 2011 by Sharon et al. of hippocampal-independent learning in humans was notable. These authors reported normal learning of new object-name associations under a Fast Mapping (FM) procedure in adults with hippocampal damage, who were amnesic according to more conventional explicit memorisation procedures. FM is an incidental learning paradigm, inspired by vocabulary acquisition in children, which is hypothesised to allow rapid, cortical-based memory formation. In the years since the original report, there has been, understandably, a growing interest in adult FM, not only because of its theoretical importance, but also because of its potential to help rehabilitate individuals with memory problems. We review the FM literature in individuals with amnesia and in healthy adults, using both explicit and implicit memory measures. Contrary to other recent reviews, we conclude that the evidence for FM in adults is weak, and restraint is needed before assuming the phenomenon exists.

Indexed as

AdultAmnesiaHippocampusHumansLearningMemoryNeuronal Plasticityepisodic encodingFast Mappinghippocampuslearningmemory

Identifiers

PMID30451079
PMCPMC6711760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.