ArticleMolecular genetics & genomic medicine2018
Compound heterozygous mutations in CFTR causing CBAVD in Chinese pedigrees.
Article in Molecular genetics & genomic medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genetic Heterogeneity Correlated with Phenotypic Variability in 48 Patients with Cystic Fibrosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Congenital Bilateral Absence of the Vas Deferens.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Review
- Analysis of CNVs of CFTR gene in Chinese Han population with CBAVD.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2020Article
- Identification of a Mutation in the Novel Compound Heterozygous CFTR in a Chinese Family with Cystic Fibrosis.Canadian respiratory journal · 2020Article
- A rare frameshift variant in trans with the IVS9-5T allele of CFTR in a Chinese pedigree with congenital aplasia of vas deferens.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2019Article
- Compound heterozygous mutations in CFTR causing CBAVD in Chinese pedigrees.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCongenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens (CBAVD) is an important cause of obstructive azoospermia and male infertility. Mutations of CFTR caused the majority of CBAVD cases, and ADGRG2 was recently identified as a new pathogenic gene. Yet, most of the genetic evidence came from sporadic cases, and only one mutation in CFTR can be found in patients.
methodsIn present study, we collected two CBAVD pedigrees, each having two affected male siblings. We performed whole exome sequencing on all patients and validated all potential variants by Sanger sequencing.
resultsWe excluded ADGRG2 variants but identified compound heterozygous variants of CFTR in both families (NM_000492.3:c.1210-33_1210-6GT[13]T[5] and c.4056G>C;p.Gln1352Cys in pedigree 1, c.592G>C;p.Ala198Pro and c.3717G>A;p.Arg1239= in pedigree 2), which were subsequently validated by direct sequencing. c.1210-33_1210-6GT[13]T[5] (also known as IVS8-T5-TG13) was a known disease-causing variant causing the skipping of exon 9 of CFTR and inherited from the proband's mother. p.Gln1352Cys and Ala198Pro were rare or novel in public databases and predicted to be deleterious. The p.Arg1239= was a synonymous variant but located at the end of an exon, which was predicted to alter the splicing pattern.
conclusionOur study, in which compound heterozygous variants were identified in two pedigrees, provides more familial evidence that only recessive variants (homozygous or compound heterozygous) in CFTR cause CBAVD. Furthermore, whole exome sequencing may be utilized as a useful tool for mutation screening of genes causing CBAVD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.