Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30450699›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International AIDS Society2018

Retention in care among clinically stable antiretroviral therapy patients following a six-monthly clinical consultation schedule: findings from a cohort study in rural Malawi.

Alison Wringe, Caoimhe Cawley, Elisabeth Szumilin, Leon Salumu, Isabel Amoros Quiles, Estelle Pasquier, Charles Masiku, Sarala Nicholas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alison WringeDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6939-3461
Caoimhe CawleyIndependent consultant, Berlin, Germany.
Elisabeth SzumilinMédecins sans Frontières, Paris, France.
Leon SalumuMédecins sans Frontières, Paris, France.
Isabel Amoros QuilesMédecins sans Frontières, Chiradzulu, Malawi.
Estelle PasquierMédecins sans Frontières, Paris, France.
Charles MasikuMédecins sans Frontières, Chiradzulu, Malawi.
Sarala NicholasEpicentre, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2139-5999

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P014313/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLonger intervals between clinic consultations for clinically stable antiretroviral therapy (ART) patients may improve retention in care and reduce facility workload. We assessed long-term retention among clinically stable ART patients attending six-monthly clinical consultations (SMCC) with three-monthly fast-track drug refills, and estimated the number of consultations "saved" by this model of ART delivery in rural Malawi.

methodsStable patients (aged ≥18 years, on first-line ART ≥12 months, CD4 count ≥300 cells/mL

resultsFrom 2008 to 2015, 22,633 clinically stable patients from 11 facilities were eligible for SMCC for at least three months, contributing 74,264 person-years of observation, and 18,363 persons (81%) initiated this model of care. The median time from eligibility to enrolment was 12 months and the median cumulative time on SMCC was 14.5 months. Five years after first SMCC eligibility, cumulative probabilities of retention were 85.5% (95% CI: 84.0% to 86.9%) among early enrollees and 93% (95% CI: 92.8% to 94.0%) among late enrollees. The cumulative probability of retention from first SMCC was 97.0% (95% CI: 96.7% to 97.3%) and 86% (95% CI: 85% to 87%) at one and five years respectively. Among eligible patients initiating SMCC, the adjusted hazards of attrition were 2.4 (95% CI: 2.0 to 2.8) times higher during periods of SMCC discontinuation compared to periods on SMCC. Male sex, younger age, more recent SMCC eligibility and WHO Stage 3/4 conditions in the past year were also independently associated with attrition from SMCC. Approximately 26,000 consultations were "saved" during 2014.

conclusionAfter five years, retention among patients attending SMCC was high, especially among women and older patients, and its scale-up could facilitate universal access to ART.

Indexed as

Retention in CareAdolescentAdultAmbulatory Care FacilitiesAnti-HIV AgentsCD4 Lymphocyte CountCohort StudiesFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMalawiMaleMiddle AgedPregnancyRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsAnti-HIV Agentsantiretroviral therapycohort studydifferentiated careMalawiretention

Identifiers

PMID30450699
PMCPMC6240757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.