Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30450666›Full record

ReviewMedicinal research reviews2019

Recent clinical trends in Toll-like receptor targeting therapeutics.

Muhammad Ayaz Anwar, Masaud Shah, Jason Kim, Sangdun Choi

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medicinal research reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 151 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
151citing papers in PubMed
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

151 citing papers in PubMed, 276 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

91 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Muhammad Ayaz AnwarDepartment of Molecular Science and Technology, Ajou University, Suwon, Korea.
Masaud ShahDepartment of Molecular Science and Technology, Ajou University, Suwon, Korea.
Jason KimJ2H Biotech, Suwon, Korea.
Sangdun ChoiDepartment of Molecular Science and Technology, Ajou University, Suwon, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5920-7848
Ajou University · KRSTR Biotech (South Korea) · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are germline-encoded receptors that are central to innate and adaptive immune responses. Owing to their vital role in inflammation, TLRs are rational targets in clinics; thus, many ligands and biologics have been reported to overcome the progression of various inflammatory and malignant conditions and support the immune system. For each TLR, at least one, and often many, drug formulations are being evaluated. Ligands reported as stand-alone drugs may also be reported based on their use in combinatorial therapeutics as adjuvants. Despite their profound efficacy in TLR-modulation in preclinical studies, multiple drugs have been terminated at different stages of clinical trials. Here, TLR modulating drugs that have been evaluated in clinical trials are discussed, along with their mode of action, suggestive failure reasons, and ways to improve the clinical outcomes. This review presents recent advances in TLR-targeting drugs and provides directions for more successful immune system manipulation.

Indexed as

Molecular Targeted TherapyAdjuvants, ImmunologicAnimalsClinical Trials as TopicDiseaseHumansLigandsSignal TransductionToll-Like ReceptorsAdjuvants, ImmunologicLigandsToll-Like Receptorsadjuvantclinical trialdruginnate immunityToll-like receptor

Identifiers

PMID30450666
PMCPMC6587958
OpenAlexW2900611152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.