Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30450485›Full record

ArticleEpilepsia open2018

A companion to the preclinical common data elements for pharmacologic studies in animal models of seizures and epilepsy. A Report of the TASK3 Pharmacology Working Group of the ILAE/AES Joint Translational Task Force.

Melissa Barker-Haliski, Lauren C Harte-Hargrove, Teresa Ravizza, Ilse Smolders, Bo Xiao, Claudia Brandt, Wolfgang Löscher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsia open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Melissa Barker-HaliskiDepartment of Pharmacy School of Pharmacy University of Washington Seattle Washington U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0002-8175-0553
Lauren C Harte-HargroveILAE/AES Joint Translational Task Force International League Against Epilepsy West Hartford Connecticut U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0001-5678-9184
Teresa RavizzaDepartment of Neuroscience IRCCS-Institute for Pharmacological Research Mario Negri Milan Italy.
Ilse SmoldersDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry Drug Analysis and Drug Information Center for Neurosciences Vrije Universiteit Brussel Brussels Belgium.
Bo XiaoDepartment of Neurology Xiangya Hospital Central South University Changsha China.
Claudia BrandtDepartment of Pharmacology, Toxicology, and Pharmacy University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover Hannover Germany.
Wolfgang LöscherDepartment of Pharmacology, Toxicology, and Pharmacy University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover Hannover Germany.

Funding

Transform Dissemination and Implementation Science in CTSA ProgramsUL1TR002319 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI John K. Amory · 2017 to 2026
$100.0M
Validation of rat models for resistant epilepsy therapyR21NS049592 · NINDS · HANOVER SCHOOL OF VETERINARY MEDICINE · PI LOSCHER, WOLFGANG · 2004 to 2005
$250k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002319NINDS NIH HHS HHSN271201100029CNINDS NIH HHS R21 NS049592
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preclinical pharmacology studies in animal models of seizures and epilepsy have provided a platform to identify more than 20 antiseizure drugs in recent decades. To minimize variability in lab-to-lab studies and to harmonize approaches to data collection and reporting methodology in pharmacologic evaluations of the next generation of therapies, we present common data elements (CDEs), case report forms (CRFs), and this companion manuscript to help with the implementation of methods for studies in established preclinical seizure and epilepsy models in adult rodents. The development of and advocacy for CDEs in preclinical research has been encouraged previously by both clinical and preclinical groups. It is anticipated that adoption and implementation of these CDEs in preclinical studies may help standardize approaches to minimize variability and increase the reproducibility of preclinical studies. Moreover, they may provide a methodologic framework for pharmacology studies in atypical animal models or models in development, which may ultimately promote novel therapy development. In the present document, we refer selectively to animal models that have a long history of preclinical use, and in some cases, are clinically validated.

Indexed as

Animal models of epilepsyAntiseizure drug discoveryChemoconvulsive modelsElectroconvulsive modelsKindled rodent modelsPhenytoinStatus epilepticus models

Identifiers

PMID30450485
PMCPMC6210039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.