Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30450484›Full record

ArticleEpilepsia open2018

A companion to the preclinical common data elements on neurobehavioral comorbidities of epilepsy: a report of the TASK3 behavior working group of the ILAE/AES Joint Translational Task Force.

Andrey Mazarati, Nigel C Jones, Aristea S Galanopoulou, Lauren C Harte-Hargrove, Lisa E Kalynchuk, Pierre-Pascal Lenck-Santini, Jesús-Servando Medel-Matus, Astrid Nehlig, Liset Menendez de la Prida, Karine Sarkisova and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsia open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Andrey MazaratiDepartment of Pediatrics David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA Los Angeles California U.S.A.
Nigel C JonesDepartment of Neuroscience Central Clinical School Monash University Melbourne Melbourne Victoria Australia.
Aristea S GalanopoulouSaul R. Korey Department of Neurology and Dominick P. Purpura Department of Neuroscience Laboratory of Developmental Epilepsy Albert Einstein College of Medicine Bronx New York U.S.A.
Lauren C Harte-HargroveJoint Translational Task Force of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) and American Epilepsy Society (AES).ORCID 0000-0001-5678-9184
Lisa E KalynchukDivision of Medical Sciences University of Victoria Victoria British Columbia Canada.
Pierre-Pascal Lenck-SantiniINMED Aix-Marseille University, INSERM Marseille France.
Jesús-Servando Medel-MatusDepartment of Pediatrics David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA Los Angeles California U.S.A.
Astrid NehligPediatric Neurology Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital University of Paris Descartes, INSERM U1129 Paris France.
Liset Menendez de la PridaInstituto Cajal, CSIC Madrid Spain.
Karine SarkisovaInstitute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology Russian Academy of Sciences Moscow Russia.
Jana VeliskovaDepartments of Cell Biology & Anatomy New York Medical College Valhalla New York U.S.A.

Funding

The Epilepsy Bioinformatics Study for Antiepileptogenic Therapy (EpiBioS4Rx) Public Engagement CoreU54NS100064 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI TOGA, ARTHUR W · 2017 to 2021
$21.7M
Mechanisms of comorbidity between epilepsy and depressionR01NS065783 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI MAZARATI, ANDREY M · 2010 to 2017
$2.9M
GABA-inflammation interplay in infantile spasmsR01NS091170 · NINDS · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI GALANOPOULOU, ARISTEA S · 2015 to 2020
$1.9M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS065783NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS091170NINDS NIH HHS U54 NS100064
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The provided companion has been developed by the Behavioral Working Group of the Joint Translational Task Force of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) and the American Epilepsy Society (AES) with the purpose of assisting the implementation of Preclinical Common Data Elements (CDE) for studying and for reporting neurobehavioral comorbidities in rodent models of epilepsy. Case Report Forms (CRFs) are provided, which should be completed on a per animal/per test basis, whereas the CDEs are a compiled list of the elements that should be reported. This companion is not designed as a list of recommendations, or guidelines for how the tests should be run-rather, it describes the different types of assessments, and highlights the importance of rigorous data collection and transparency in this regard. The tests are divided into 7 categories for examining behavioral dysfunction on the syndrome level: deficits in learning and memory; depression; anxiety; autism; attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder; psychosis; and aggression. Correspondence and integration of these categories into the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) is introduced. Developmental aspects are addressed through the introduction of developmental milestones. Discussion includes complexities, limitations, and biases associated with neurobehavioral testing, especially when performed in animals with epilepsy, as well as the importance of rigorous data collection and of transparent reporting. This represents, to our knowledge, the first such resource dedicated to preclinical CDEs for behavioral testing of rodents.

Indexed as

Animal modelsBehaviorComorbiditiesEpilepsy

Identifiers

PMID30450484
PMCPMC6210046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.