ArticleeNeurologicalSci2018
Comparison of costs and outcomes of patients presenting with a rare brainstem syndrome.
Article in eNeurologicalSci, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this case report we compare two patients presenting with similar symptoms of a brainstem syndrome including ataxia, dysarthria, and diplopia. Their MRIs showed hyperintense FLAIR signal changes with patchy areas of contrast enhancement within the brainstem particularly the pons and cerebellum. The broad differential diagnosis of this brainstem pathology included rhomboencephalitis, neurosarcoidosis, lymphoma, vasculitis, infection, and paraneoplastic or autoimmune process. Patient 1 had an extensive work up including CSF cytology, MRI brain spectroscopy, full body CT, cerebral angiogram, and ultimately brainstem biopsy. None of these studies were diagnostic of a specific etiology and total cost was $176,069. After months of declining medical condition without a clear diagnosis, chronic lymphocytic inflammation with pontine perivascular enhancement responsive to steroids (CLIPPERS) was considered and the patient began steroid therapy resulting in clinical and radiographic improvement. Patient 2 had serum and CSF studies that were negative for infectious, paraneoplastic, and other inflammatory processes. The team diagnosed CLIPPERS and initiated steroid therapy within days resulting in dramatic clinical and radiographic resolution. The workup cost $12,905. Comparison of these cases shows how early awareness of CLIPPERS and a directed diagnostic work up can limit invasive diagnostic testing, expedite initiation of effective therapy, improve patient outcomes, and reduce cost.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.