Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30450285›Full record

ReviewToxicology reports2018

The dose response principle from philosophy to modern toxicology: The impact of ancient philosophy and medicine in modern toxicology science.

A M Tsatsakis, L Vassilopoulou, L Kovatsi, C Tsitsimpikou, M Karamanou, G Leon, J Liesivuori, A W Hayes, D A Spandidos

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxicology reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Colchicine-The Divine Medicine against COVID-19.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. The dichotomy between health and drug abuse in bodybuilding.Nordisk alkohol- & narkotikatidskrift : NAT · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

A M TsatsakisDepartment of Forensic Sciences and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, 71003, Greece.
L VassilopoulouLaboratory of Forensic Sciences and Toxicology, Medical School, University of Crete, Heraklion, 71409, Greece.
L KovatsiLaboratory of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, St. Kyriakidi 1, 54124, Thessaloniki, Greece.
C TsitsimpikouGeneral Chemical State Laboratory of Greece, Athens, Greece.
M KaramanouHistory of Medicine, Medical School, University of Crete, Greece.
G LeonDepartment of Forensic Sciences and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, 71003, Greece.
J LiesivuoriDepartment of Pharmacology, Drug Development and Therapeutics, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
A W HayesUniversity of South Florida College of Public Health USA and Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
D A SpandidosLaboratory of Clinical Virology, Medical School, University of Crete, 71003, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since ancient times the concept of dose response, from a toxicological perspective, has been a matter of concern. Already by the 8th century BC and over the years, many enlightened people have attempted to interpret this phenomenon, observing and coming across its results and practical implementation through exposure to chemical substances, either from natural or synthetic sources. Nowadays, the environmental exposure of human populations to chemicals in terms of quantity and quality might differ. Nevertheless, dose response still remains an issue joining hands with scientific and technological progress. The aim of the present review is not only to briefly recount the history of the dose response concept, from ancient time theories to novel approaches, but also to draw the outline of challenges and requirements toxicology science needs to fulfill.

Indexed as

BiomonitoringDose responseHormesisMithridatismRisk assessmentToleranceToxicology science

Identifiers

PMID30450285
PMCPMC6226566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.