ArticleEnergy for sustainable development : the journal of the International Energy Initiative2018
Implementation and scale-up of a biomass pellet and improved cookstove enterprise in Rwanda.
Article in Energy for sustainable development : the journal of the International Energy Initiative, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Health impacts of a randomized biomass cookstove intervention in northern Ghana.BMC public health · 2021Trial
- Trial
- Connecting the dots: internet access, income, and clean cooking energy adoption among rural households in Pakistan.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Evaluating the Laboratory Performance of Pellet-Fueled Semigasifier Cookstoves.Environmental science & technology · 2025Article
- Acceptability of improved cook stoves-a scoping review of the literature.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Perception and barriers to improved charcoal cookstoves adoption in Wereta, Ethiopia.BMC public health · 2024Article
- A comprehensive review of the production, adoption and sustained use of biomass pellets in Ghana.Heliyon · 2023Review
- Firm innovation activities and consumer brand loyalty: A path to business sustainability in Asia.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Determinants of Household Energy Choice for Cooking in Northern Sudan: A Multinomial Logit Estimation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Which Biomass Stove(s) Capable of Reducing Household Air Pollution Are Available to the Poorest Communities Globally?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Review
- Mutagenicity- and pollutant-emission factors of pellet-fueled gasifier cookstoves: Comparison with other combustion sources.The Science of the total environment · 2020Article
- Systems Science Approaches for Global Environmental Health Research: Enhancing Intervention Design and Implementation for Household Air Pollution (HAP) and Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene (WASH) Programs.Environmental health perspectives · 2020Article
- Everybody Stacks: Lessons from household energy case studies to inform design principles for clean energy transitions.Energy policy · 2020Article
- Supply Considerations for Scaling Up Clean Cooking Fuels for Household Energy in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.GeoHealth · 2019Review
- Barriers and facilitators to adoption and use of fuel pellets and improved cookstoves in urban Rwanda.PloS one · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper reviews the experience of a for-profit firm in Rwanda promoting biomass pellets and a fan micro-gasification improved cookstove as a clean cooking alternative to charcoal. Consumers purchase locally produced biomass pellets and receive the improved cookstove on a lease basis. The cost of the pellets and stove(s) is lower than the cost of cooking with charcoal in the urban setting where our study takes place. Inyenyeri has been piloting its business model since 2012. Using data from an ongoing quantitative impact evaluation study, focus group discussions, and a series of key informant interviews, we chronicle the firm's experience with stove choice, pellet production, and marketing, highlighting lessons for the design of private sector led clean cooking interventions We find that 38% of households marketed to as part of our ongoing impact evaluation study adopted the pellet and stove system, but that approximately 45% of those who adopted suspended contracts after signing up. The firm's experience with stove choice, pellet production, pricing structures, and customer service strategies have influenced implementation, adoption rates, and scale-up. Customer preferences for specific stove attributes and willingness of stove manufacturers to modify stoves for local conditions have influenced both the firm's choice of stove and customer satisfaction. In 2015 the firm transitioned customers from the Philips stove to the Mimi Moto, a decision which created confusion among consumers, and affected adoption rates. Despite the challenge of establishing and scaling-up pellet production in central Africa, the firm increased production 400% between 2014 and 2017 to reach 800,000 kg/year. Importing and maintaining pelletizing equipment in Rwanda is costly, the supply of feedstock, and undercapitalization of the firm have affected production. With respect to marketing, after experimenting with a sign-up fee and a minimum monthly purchase of pellets, the firm has decided to transition to a pay-as-you-go system to reduce perceived risk by consumers. A high-level of customer service including in home visits, free in-home repair, and home delivery of pellets are major innovations. The long pilot phase and the evolutionary nature of the firm's activities illustrate both the complexity of building a market for clean cooking, and the time required to understand nascent markets and consumer demand.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.