Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30449769›Full record

ArticleJournal of epidemiology2019

Socioeconomic Disparity in the Prevalence of Objectively Evaluated Diabetes Among Older Japanese Adults: JAGES Cross-Sectional Data in 2010.

Yuiko Nagamine, Naoki Kondo, Kenichi Yokobayashi, Asami Ota, Yasuhiro Miyaguni, Yuri Sasaki, Yukako Tani, Katsunori Kondo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of epidemiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Impact of Income and Industry on New-Onset Diabetes among Employees: A Retrospective Cohort Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Area-based socioeconomic status and mortality: the Ludwigshafen Risk and Cardiovascular Health study.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Yuiko NagamineDepartment of Public Health, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1901-6697
Naoki KondoDepartment of Health Education and Health Sociology, School of Public Health, the University of Tokyo.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6425-6844
Kenichi YokobayashiHomecare Clinic.
Asami OtaDivision of Health and Nutrition, University of Niigata Prefecture.
Yasuhiro MiyaguniDepartment of Gerontological Evaluation, Center for Gerontology and Social Science, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology.
Yuri SasakiDepartment of International Health and Collaboration, National Institute of Public Health.
Yukako TaniDepartment of Global Health Promotion, Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5533-2844
Katsunori KondoDepartment of Public Health, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University.
Chiba University · JPMemorialCare Health System · USNational Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology · JPNihon Fukushi University · JPTokyo Medical and Dental University · JPUniversity of Niigata Prefecture · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudies on sex-specific socioeconomic gradients in objectively evaluated diabetes among older adults are scarce.

methodsWe used cross-sectional data of 9,893 adults aged 65 years and older in Aichi Prefecture without long-term care insurance from the Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study (JAGES) in 2010 (Response rate: 66.3%). We collected demographic, socioeconomic (income, years of education, and longest occupation) and behavioral information using a mail-in self-reported survey. Blood samples for the objectively evaluated diabetes and self-reported medical history were collected at annual municipal health checkups. Poisson regression analysis stratified by sex with multiple imputations was conducted to calculate prevalence ratio and 95% confidence interval.

resultsA clear income gradient in diabetes prevalence was observed among women, from 11.7% in the lowest income quartile (Q1) to 7.8% in the highest (Q4). Among men, the findings were 17.6% in Q1 to 15.1% in Q4. The prevalence ratios for diabetes with incomes Q1 to Q4 were 1.43 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-1.90) for women and 1.16 (95% CI, 0.90-1.50) for men after adjusting for age and other socioeconomic factors. Even after adjusting for marital status, body mass index, other metabolic risk factors, and lifestyle factors, the income-based gradient remained among women. Education and occupation were not significantly associated with diabetes in the study population.

conclusionsOnly women showed an income-based gradient in diabetes. Monitoring income gradient in diabetes is important in public health actions, even in older populations. Future longitudinal and intervention studies should evaluate the causal link of income to diabetes onset, determine the mechanisms of the potential sex differences in the income/diabetes association, and identify ways to mitigate the income-based inequality.

Indexed as

Health Status DisparitiesAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetes MellitusFemaleHumansJapanMalePrevalenceSex DistributionSocioeconomic Factorsdiabetes mellituselderly adultsJapansex differencessocioeconomic status

Identifiers

PMID30449769
PMCPMC6614078
OpenAlexW2900851032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.