Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30449623›Full record

Trial reportLancet (London, England)2019

Radiotherapy plus cisplatin or cetuximab in low-risk human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal cancer (De-ESCALaTE HPV): an open-label randomised controlled phase 3 trial.

Hisham Mehanna, Max Robinson, Andrew Hartley, Anthony Kong, Bernadette Foran, Tessa Fulton-Lieuw, Matthew Dalby, Pankaj Mistry, Mehmet Sen, Lorcan O'Toole and 22 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lancet (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 491 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
491citing papers in PubMed, 13 pooled it
97.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

491 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,004 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. SEOM-TTCC clinical guidelines for the treatment of head and neck cancer (2025).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Guideline
  4. Efficacy and safety of cetuximab-based versus platinum-based chemoradiation in HNSCC: evidence from a meta-analysis of 10 randomized controlled trials.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Guideline
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Functional and quality-of-life outcomes following salvage surgery for recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2023
    Pooled it
  13. The relevance of ototoxicity induced by radiotherapy.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2023
    Pooled it
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Postoperative Radiotherapy ± Cetuximab for Intermediate-Risk Head and Neck Cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025
    Trial
  20. Trial

431 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

32 authors at 20 institutions in 3 countries.

Hisham MehannaInstitute for Head and Neck Studies and Education (InHANSE), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. Electronic address: h.mehanna@bham.ac.uk.
Max RobinsonNewcastle University, Newcastle, UK.
Andrew HartleyUniversity Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Anthony KongInstitute for Head and Neck Studies and Education (InHANSE), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Bernadette ForanWeston Park Hospital, Sheffield, UK.
Tessa Fulton-LieuwInstitute for Head and Neck Studies and Education (InHANSE), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Matthew DalbyUniversity of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Pankaj MistryUniversity of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Mehmet SenSt James's Institute of Oncology, Leeds, UK.
Lorcan O'TooleQueen's Centre for Oncology, Castle Hill Hospital, Cottingham, UK.
Hoda Al BoozBristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Bristol, UK.
Karen DykerSt James' University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Rafael MoleronAberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK.
Stephen WhitakerRoyal Surrey County Hospital, Surrey, UK.
Sinead BrennanSt Luke's Hospital, Cancer Trials Ireland, and St Luke's Institute of Cancer Research, Dublin, Ireland.
Audrey CookCheltenham General Hospital, Cheltenham, UK.
Matthew GriffinNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Eleanor AynsleyJames Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.
Martin RollesAbertawe Bro Morgannwg University Health Board, Port Talbot, UK.
Emma De WintonRoyal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Bath, UK.
Andrew ChanUniversity Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.
Devraj SrinivasanWestern General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.
Ioanna NixonBeatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK.
Joanne GrumettUniversity of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
C René LeemansVU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Jan ButerVU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Julia HendersonNational RTTQA Group, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
Kevin HarringtonInstitute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden Hospital, London UK.
Christopher McConkeyUniversity of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Alastair GrayUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Janet DunnUniversity of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
De-ESCALaTE HPV Trial Group
University of Warwick · GBSt James's University Hospital · GBAmsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLRoyal Marsden Hospital · GBRoyal United Hospital Bath NHS Trust · GBSwansea Bay University Health Board · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GBAberdeen Royal Infirmary · GBAt Bristol · GBCastle Hill Hospital · GBCheltenham General Hospital · GBJames Cook University Hospital · GBNIHR Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Research Centre · GBNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBRoyal Surrey County Hospital · GBUniversity Hospital Coventry · GBWestern General Hospital · GBWeston Park Cancer Centre · GBBeatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre · GBCancer Trials Ireland · IE

Funding

Cancer Research UK 12834Cancer Research UK 16801Medical Research Council MR/N005872/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe incidence of human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive oropharyngeal cancer, a disease affecting younger patients, is rapidly increasing. Cetuximab, an epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor, has been proposed for treatment de-escalation in this setting to reduce the toxicity of standard cisplatin treatment, but no randomised evidence exists for the efficacy of this strategy.

methodsWe did an open-label randomised controlled phase 3 trial at 32 head and neck treatment centres in Ireland, the Netherlands, and the UK, in patients aged 18 years or older with HPV-positive low-risk oropharyngeal cancer (non-smokers or lifetime smokers with a smoking history of <10 pack-years). Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive, in addition to radiotherapy (70 Gy in 35 fractions), either intravenous cisplatin (100 mg/m

findingsBetween Nov 12, 2012, and Oct 1, 2016, 334 patients were recruited (166 in the cisplatin group and 168 in the cetuximab group). Overall (acute and late) severe (grade 3-5) toxicity did not differ significantly between treatment groups at 24 months (mean number of events per patient 4·8 [95% CI 4·2-5·4] with cisplatin vs 4·8 [4·2-5·4] with cetuximab; p=0·98). At 24 months, overall all-grade toxicity did not differ significantly either (mean number of events per patient 29·2 [95% CI 27·3-31·0] with cisplatin vs 30·1 [28·3-31·9] with cetuximab; p=0·49). However, there was a significant difference between cisplatin and cetuximab in 2-year overall survival (97·5% vs 89·4%, hazard ratio 5·0 [95% CI 1·7-14·7]; p=0·001) and 2-year recurrence (6·0% vs 16·1%, 3·4 [1·6-7·2]; p=0·0007).

interpretationCompared with the standard cisplatin regimen, cetuximab showed no benefit in terms of reduced toxicity, but instead showed significant detriment in terms of tumour control. Cisplatin and radiotherapy should be used as the standard of care for HPV-positive low-risk patients who are able to tolerate cisplatin.

fundingCancer Research UK.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAntineoplastic AgentsCetuximabChemoradiotherapyCisplatinDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingOropharyngeal NeoplasmsPapillomavirus InfectionsRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRisk AssessmentAntineoplastic AgentsCetuximabCisplatin

Identifiers

PMID30449623
PMCPMC6319250
OpenAlexW2901385432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.