Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30449531›Full record

Trial reportBiological psychiatry2019

Computational Modeling Applied to the Dot-Probe Task Yields Improved Reliability and Mechanistic Insights.

Rebecca B Price, Vanessa Brown, Greg J Siegle

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Biological psychiatry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Effects of attention bias modification for anxiety: Neurophysiological indices and moderation by symptom severity.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2023
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Neural Bases of Affect-Based Impulsivity: A Decision Neuroscience Account.Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. The role of affective states in computational psychiatry.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. No Evidence of Reliability Across 36 Variations of the Emotional Dot-Probe Task in 9,600 Participants.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Reinforcement-Learning-Informed Queries Guide Behavioral Change.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rebecca B PriceDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. Electronic address: rebecca.price@stanfordalumni.org.
Vanessa BrownDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Greg J SiegleDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.

Funding

Neural Dimensions of Attention Bias Modification for Transdiagnostic AnxietyK23MH100259 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI PRICE, REBECCA · 2013 to 2017
$788k
NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH100259
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBiased patterns of attention are implicated as key mechanisms across many forms of psychopathology and have given rise to automated mechanistic interventions designed to modify such attentional preferences. However, progress is substantially hindered by limitations in widely used methods to quantify attention, bias leading to imprecision of measurement.

methodsIn a sample of patients who were clinically anxious (n = 70), we applied a well-validated form of computational modeling (drift-diffusion model) to trial-level reaction time data from a two-choice "dot-probe task"-the dominant paradigm used in hundreds of attention bias studies to date-in order to model distinct components of task performance.

resultsWhile drift-diffusion model-derived attention bias indices exhibited convergent validity with previous approaches (e.g., conventional bias scores, eye tracking), our novel analytic approach yielded substantially improved split-half reliability, modestly improved test-retest reliability, and revealed novel mechanistic insights regarding neural substrates of attention bias and the impact of an automated attention retraining procedure.

conclusionsComputational modeling of attention bias task data may represent a new way forward to improve precision.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalAdultAnxiety DisordersAttentional BiasBehavior TherapyCerebral CortexFollow-Up StudiesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuropsychological TestsPsychomotor PerformanceReproducibility of ResultsAnxietyAttention biasAttention bias modificationComputational modelingComputational psychiatryDrift-diffusion model

Identifiers

PMID30449531
PMCPMC6420394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.