Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30449150›Full record

Observational studyCephalalgia : an international journal of headache2019

Altered speech with migraine attacks: A prospective, longitudinal study of episodic migraine without aura.

Todd J Schwedt, Jacob Peplinski, Pamela Garcia-Filion, Visar Berisha

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Acoustic voice analysis of women with migraine.Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2026
    Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Evaluating migraine with typical aura with neuroimaging.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Cerebro-Cerebellar Networks in Migraine Symptoms and Headache.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Neuroimaging clues of migraine aura.The journal of headache and pain · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Todd J Schwedt1 Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Jacob Peplinski2 School of Electrical, Computer and Energy Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
Pamela Garcia-Filion3 Department of Biological Informatics, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Visar Berisha2 School of Electrical, Computer and Energy Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.

Funding

Perception of dysarthric speech: An objective model of dysarthric speech evaluation with actionable outcomesR01DC006859 · NIDCD · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI BERISHA, VISAR, LISS, JULIE M · 2004 to 2021
$4.8M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC006859
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveSome individuals with migraine report the presence of speech changes during their migraine attacks. The goal of this study was to compare objective features of speech during the migraine pre-attack, the migraine attack, and during the interictal period.

methodsThis was a prospective, longitudinal, observational study of adults with episodic migraine and healthy non-migraine controls. Participants provided speech samples three times per day using a speech elicitation tool included within a mobile app. Six complementary speech features that capture articulation and prosody were extracted from speech samples. Participants with migraine maintained a daily headache diary using the same app. A mixed effects model and t-tests were used to investigate differences in speech features between controls, the migraine pre-attack phase, the migraine attack, and the interictal period.

resultsIn total, 56,767 speech samples were collected, including 43,102 from 15 individuals with migraine and 13,665 from matched healthy controls. Significant group-level differences in speech features were identified between those with migraine and healthy controls and within the migraine group during the pre-attack vs. attack vs. interictal periods (all p < .05). Most consistently, speech changes occurred in the speaking rate, articulation rate and precision, and phonatory duration. Within-subject analysis revealed that seven of 15 individuals with migraine showed significant change in at least one speech feature when comparing the migraine attack vs. interictal phase and four showed similar changes when comparing the pre-attack vs. interictal phases.

conclusionsChanges in speech occurred in almost half of the individuals during migraine attacks. Once confirmed in subsequent studies, speech changes could be considered a feature of the migraine attack.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedMigraine DisordersProspective StudiesSpeech DisordersanalyticsheadachelanguageMigrainepremonitoryspeech

Identifiers

PMID30449150
PMCPMC6939667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.