Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30449007›Full record

ArticleDermatology and therapy2019

A Simulation-Based Workshop to Improve Dermatologists' Communication Skills: A Pilot for Continuing Medical Education.

Lina Saeed, Isabelle M Sanchez, Nina C Botto, Charles N Ellis, Erik J Stratman, Jennifer Thompson, Kanade Shinkai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dermatology and therapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lina SaeedDepartment of Dermatology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Isabelle M SanchezDepartment of Dermatology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Nina C BottoDepartment of Dermatology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Charles N EllisDepartment of Dermatology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Erik J StratmanDepartment of Dermatology, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WI, USA.
Jennifer ThompsonAmerican Academy of Dermatology, Schaumburg, IL, USA.
Kanade ShinkaiDepartment of Dermatology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. Kanade.Shinkai@ucsf.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCommunication skills influence the quality of health care and patient experience; both may affect provider reimbursement. There are few opportunities available for practicing physicians to receive direct feedback on communication in patient encounters. The purpose of this simulation-based patient encounter workshop was for dermatologists to practice and obtain feedback on their communication skills.

methodsIn March 2016, dermatologists participated in a workshop with four simulated patient encounters. Cases were developed based on a prior needs assessment. Standardized patient educators evaluated participants' communication using the Master Interview Rating Scale and provided verbal feedback. Physicians rated the usefulness of the simulation and the feedback received through a survey upon workshop completion.

resultsOf the 170 physicians who registered, 103 participated in the simulation. The workshop was highly rated in meeting its three learning objectives (score of 4.5-4.6 out of a maximum score of 5). The lowest-rated communication skills were as follows: allowing the patient to share their narrative thread (3.1), summarizing the patient's history from the provider (3.8), and assessing patient understanding (3.8).

conclusionsParticipants reported that this communication workshop effectively satisfied its learning objectives. Opportunities to practice and improve communication skills as part of continuing medical education will benefit the clinical experience of patients and physicians alike, and the workshop may be formatted to serve physicians of other specialties. The lowest-scoring communication areas identified in this study present an opportunity to develop a tailored curriculum for physician-patient communication in the future.

Indexed as

CommunicationContinuing medical education (CME)DermatologyFeedbackObjective structured clinical examination (OSCE)SimulationStandardized patient

Identifiers

PMID30449007
PMCPMC6380981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.